Andy Sabisch
Active member
. . . . . . we all have them!
I welcome your opinion but you know what, I do not write for Consumer Reports and guess what, advertising dollars still pay for printing metal detecting magazines. Over the years others have tried to come up with newsletters that were totally independent and guess what, they failed miserably. Sorry, but this is not a multi-million dollar hobby . . . which is why there a handful of companies and two magazines.
Bought detectors that were endorsed by me??? You give me way too much credit! I have bought equipment based on recommendations that turned out to be a dud . . . and not just in metal detecting . . heck, my wife's car was a Consumer Reports Best Buy and it has been the biggest lemon we've owned in 30 years! Should I post that their reviews are biased and they must be on the take?
I have never asked for or requested free equipment from ANY manufacturer and those that now me can attest to that . . . and have even said I was an idiot not to do so. As a matter of fact, during the trial phase for the X-Terra's, I had to pay for the shipping back to the factory each time a change was made . . . . want to see the bills?
As far as not saying anything bad, I again suggest you read over some past test reports and read the summary sections . . . . . not all positive at least on my screen and I can give you a few companies to call to see what they thought.
As far as not being used in the future if any of us provide negative feedback, the feedback I have received from all manufacturers save two has been that my comments were not what they wanted to hear but after thinking about them, they were what they NEEDED to hear.
Those that were used for testing the X-50 and X-30 models were contacted by Minelab and told to write what they thought - absolutley no screening took place and Minelab never asked 1) to see the comments first or 2) for the equipment back. There were some hard hitting comments from those testers - far from 100% positive. Sounds like the factory valued INDEPENDENT assessment of their equipment.
Enough of this banter that will go nowhere as you have your opinion cast in stone and it is really counter productive to argue about something that really has no resolution. Feel free to buy all the detectors out there and write an independent report . . . . build a following and see if your business model flies . . . .
Let's all go out and find some "goodies" and turn off the computers for a while!
Andy Sabisch
I welcome your opinion but you know what, I do not write for Consumer Reports and guess what, advertising dollars still pay for printing metal detecting magazines. Over the years others have tried to come up with newsletters that were totally independent and guess what, they failed miserably. Sorry, but this is not a multi-million dollar hobby . . . which is why there a handful of companies and two magazines.
Bought detectors that were endorsed by me??? You give me way too much credit! I have bought equipment based on recommendations that turned out to be a dud . . . and not just in metal detecting . . heck, my wife's car was a Consumer Reports Best Buy and it has been the biggest lemon we've owned in 30 years! Should I post that their reviews are biased and they must be on the take?
I have never asked for or requested free equipment from ANY manufacturer and those that now me can attest to that . . . and have even said I was an idiot not to do so. As a matter of fact, during the trial phase for the X-Terra's, I had to pay for the shipping back to the factory each time a change was made . . . . want to see the bills?
As far as not saying anything bad, I again suggest you read over some past test reports and read the summary sections . . . . . not all positive at least on my screen and I can give you a few companies to call to see what they thought.
As far as not being used in the future if any of us provide negative feedback, the feedback I have received from all manufacturers save two has been that my comments were not what they wanted to hear but after thinking about them, they were what they NEEDED to hear.
Those that were used for testing the X-50 and X-30 models were contacted by Minelab and told to write what they thought - absolutley no screening took place and Minelab never asked 1) to see the comments first or 2) for the equipment back. There were some hard hitting comments from those testers - far from 100% positive. Sounds like the factory valued INDEPENDENT assessment of their equipment.
Enough of this banter that will go nowhere as you have your opinion cast in stone and it is really counter productive to argue about something that really has no resolution. Feel free to buy all the detectors out there and write an independent report . . . . build a following and see if your business model flies . . . .
Let's all go out and find some "goodies" and turn off the computers for a while!
Andy Sabisch