Find's Treasure Forums

Welcome to Find's Treasure Forums, Guests!

You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.

Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.

Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.

Click here to register!



Need Support Help?

Cannot log in?, click here to have new password emailed to you

Changed email? Forgot to update your account with new email address? Need assistance with something else?, click here to go to Find's Support Form and fill out the form.

To all the people not getting a CTX 3030

But common sense should tell you that the detectors GPS will not work under water and that the detector will not give a good target signal and a bad target signal at the same time.
I believe that it has more bells and whistles than what are needed and i see a few more problems with this detector but i have no intention of bashing it. Or upsetting people who think that this new detector is going to be the bees knees.
I do come here to see if my thoughts on this detector are right or if the reports from people that are using this detector are proving my thoughts wrong.

I will add that the reason why you are getting all the negative posts on here are all down to Minelab, as the release of this detector and all the drip feeding of information on this new detector with no real field test as such is what has caused all the bad feeling with all the negative posts.
 
Les don't say anything bad about minelab :rofl:

troll-web.jpg


or you will get in trouble :biggrin:

about 1 hr ago i sent off payment for this detector and i agree it has some features i most probably will NOT use but they say its better than my etrac so i will find out for myself the forum is a bit of fun but i do my own testing and so far i have nothing to report other than minelab have a business modal that's gotten up some noses including mine and if they want the sales they have to cop the flack too otherwise its not real,

after saying all that we seem like a pretty passionate bunch i own several brands and they are good at what i use them for but i sure have no need to stick up for the company's that's their job. i say what i see .

BP
 
Blank Planet said:
Les don't say anything bad about minelab :rofl:

troll-web.jpg


or you will get in trouble :biggrin:

BP

OK i won't say anything bad about minelab, so long as they apologise for there small advertising error- mix up and agree to sell the guys on this forum a CTX 3030 at half price. :cheers:
 
yeah right i wish :biggrin: well it cost me near twice as much as the etrac so it better be twice as good :shrug:

BP
 
D&P-OR its just a bit of fun well it is for me there is no malice involved i own 3 minelabs and love them :clapping: i think we are just passing time as no one has any real questions as they haven't used the machine yet.

BP
 
Even the reports from the Trolls who will be writing make up field tests on it should make good reading :confused: (you just know that is going to happen)

Have fun and be nice you guys, as it's only a metal detector. Les in the UK
 
thats it nailed it its only a metal detector :lmfao: just hope it finds more silver than nails :biggrin:

BP
 
The reason is because many of the Trolls, as you call them, are dedicated Minelab users that have waited almost 15 years for a new design. Should they have no voice if they happen to think some of the features are less than stellar? I can really sympathise with folks that don't like the weight. Getting older and having joint problems really is an issue for many. Hopefully the forum will continue to let everyone post their opinion. If it is clearly a post by a Troll, then everyone will know.
HH - Robin (MI)
 
One big problem is darn few people have any appreciation for what it takes to go from ideas to R&D to prototyping to production. The Walmart mentality says I should have everything I want now and cheap or I'm going to whine and cry about it. Developing something like this and getting it built is a huge task. Most people wouldn't have the stick to it to get the plastic molds designed, approved and made, not to mention the cost of setting up just that small part of the whole package.

Since they haven't any appreciation for it they find it so easy to Monday morning quarterback the whole thing and then the instant gratification of the internet gives them a soapbox to stand on. I've been involved in manufacturing and helping people launch a product. My hat is off to Minelab. It's a big undertaking involving considerable time, money and effort. Far more then most people on a forum will ever realise and if you've never done it you really don't have a clue. I don't mean this in a nasty way it's just a simple fact. It's like owning a business. Everyone whose never done it is an expert on what you should do but in truth until you've done it you'll never understand.

They have considerable money and effort on the line and I hope it does well. To all the armchair experts I suggest you try and launch a better product! That's called being an entrepreneur and you will gain a vast appreciation for what is involved!
 
Paul's point was not directed at dedicated Minelab users that have been waiting for 15 years for a New design. Some of these post are from people that are new members or have slid over from another forum and have already made a decision it is a boat anchor or POS so to speak. Glad they have a crystal ball, I'd like to borrow it and use it to get some lottery numbers.

Nothing wrong with discussion of the weight and strain associated with joint pain or shoulder problems. There is nothing wrong with someone not interested in some of the features on the machine that they feel they won't use.

And then you have folks bashing Minelab for the way the machine is being released. There has to be a release date for the machine at some point so what's the problem?

Minelab could have just kept the machine under wraps, only had Minelab employees test the machine. They could have kept it from the dealers/distributors and just unveiled it on the 28th. If that was the case then how many people would be excited about purchasing one and how many pre-orders would have taken place? NONE!


At least the way they released the information and the allowance of independent testers, we have this forum and we have had the information to decide whether we want one or not come purchase time.

BCOOP
 
whew! this is a bunch of reading that does nothing to help anything:rolleyes:
 
theyre not trolling just expressing their anguish that ML never listens to their requests for a lighter machine .
they would like to have one ,but too heavy !
 
targets said:
theyre not trolling just expressing their anguish that ML never listens to their requests for a lighter machine .
they would like to have one ,but too heavy !

Maybe they're not but you are. :starwars:
 
Sailorman said:
One big problem is darn few people have any appreciation for what it takes to go from ideas to R&D to prototyping to production. The Walmart mentality says I should have everything I want now and cheap or I'm going to whine and cry about it. Developing something like this and getting it built is a huge task. Most people wouldn't have the stick to it to get the plastic molds designed, approved and made, not to mention the cost of setting up just that small part of the whole package.

Since they haven't any appreciation for it they find it so easy to Monday morning quarterback the whole thing and then the instant gratification of the internet gives them a soapbox to stand on. I've been involved in manufacturing and helping people launch a product. My hat is off to Minelab. It's a big undertaking involving considerable time, money and effort. Far more then most people on a forum will ever realise and if you've never done it you really don't have a clue. I don't mean this in a nasty way it's just a simple fact. It's like owning a business. Everyone whose never done it is an expert on what you should do but in truth until you've done it you'll never understand.

They have considerable money and effort on the line and I hope it does well. To all the armchair experts I suggest you try and launch a better product! That's called being an entrepreneur and you will gain a vast appreciation for what is involved!

I want to post Robins point first:

The reason is because many of the Trolls, as you call them, are dedicated Minelab users that have waited almost 15 years for a new design. Should they have no voice if they happen to think some of the features are less than stellar? I can really sympathise with folks that don't like the weight. Getting older and having joint problems really is an issue for many. Hopefully the forum will continue to let everyone post their opinion. If it is clearly a post by a Troll, then everyone will know.
HH - Robin (MI)

I think we can see some of the truth in both posts and yet both posts address polar opposites to a point. Clearly a lot of work went into the new Minelab CTX. It looks to be a great machine. The BIGGEST complaint I've seen with the E-Trac/Explorer is weight though and for all the issues that Robin says, but even for younger folks. So, even though we have what looks like an incredible unit, the #1 task wasn't fully addressed. I say fully because it feels lighter to everyone that has used it, so maybe we don't really know yet. But when we see the weight went up and not down, it's a bit of a shock.

I too wanted a lighter unit and in a way we got it, as it is "effectively lighter". We'll see once more reports come out.

I think the observable danger in calling people trolls and such (or even assuming them to be) is that we are missing some valid points. Now that is on both sides. On the one hand people with worries or gripes need to learn to present them better and perhaps present both sides. And on the other hand people who see this "trolling" behavior, perhaps, need to not take it as personal and just address the concerns while also mentioning the good things. No, not their job, but I think we can all get a long ok, just have to try ;-)

Lastly, regarding the marketing debacle (reading many boards, this is the consensus - the 48hr countdown was great, but after that it kind of fell apart), I really hope that Minelab doesn't have another lighter unit on the horizon and release it in 6 months or so. If they have something in between, by all means release it now and be a bit compassionate regarding people and money, as times are truly tough. If we can save some money and remove some things, then lets see it now, not later.

Albert
 
targets said:
theyre not trolling just expressing their anguish that ML never listens to their requests for a lighter machine .
they would like to have one ,but too heavy !

How do you know its to heavy ??? Have you swung one ???
 
There may be another machine in the works, look what happened right after the SE Pro was introduced. What was it, 6 or 8 months and up sprung the E-Trac.

Research and Development goes hand in hand with Marketing and profit margins. Research is usually well ahead of what is currently being developed and marketing is being done after development is complete and ready for sales.

I'm not sure if the metal detecting industry is like the computer industry. Capable computer technology is well in advance of what is available for us to purchase today and product is released one advancement at a time. They don't make big leaps in advanced capabilities for purchase or they miss all the sales in between and those sales in between make for a successful long lived business.

Who knows what the future of discovery will bring, but now I want it to bring my CTX 3030 already. :thumbup:


BCOOP
 
[/quote]
Lastly, regarding the marketing debacle (reading many boards, this is the consensus - the 48hr countdown was great, but after that it kind of fell apart), I really hope that Minelab doesn't have another lighter unit on the horizon and release it in 6 months or so. If they have something in between, by all means release it now and be a bit compassionate regarding people and money, as times are truly tough. If we can save some money and remove some things, then lets see it now, not later.

Albert[/quote]

if minelab do that i don't care how good they are i will not buy another machine from them because a lot of features on this new one i do not need but some i do if they put out one in 6months with all the stuff i want and without the stuff i don't they will have got the last cent out of me. sure i would not be the only one :biggrin: then it would be just pure money grabbing and very underhanded, and if i am a troll then so be it but obviously they can make a machine without the GPS etc which i don't need anyway we will see.

BP
 
earthmansurfer said:
Lastly, regarding the marketing debacle (reading many boards, this is the consensus - the 48hr countdown was great, but after that it kind of fell apart)

Albert

I've asked a couple of people without truly getting an answer so I'll ask you because I know I'll get an answer. What I'm trying to wrap my head around is this idea that the marketing/product launch was a debacle or awful or some other adjective. My question is why?
 
Some of the people seem to be very knowledgeable about electronics and what makes detectors do what they do. Minelab and other companies are always looking for design engineers. That would be a great job developing your own ideas into a product that the public buys and enjoys so people like me can buy one. Just a thought. HH :minelab:
 
Top