You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.
Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.
Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.
Critterhunter said:Let me explain a little more on where I am coming from. I happen to be a conservative and so feel that government doesn't have the right to tell me how to do most things in life. I don't want people telling me what to eat, what to feel guilty about, where I can smoke, where I'm allowed to pray, how I should spend my money, and so on. I get rather upset about government sticking it's nose in my business when it has no right to.
On the other hand, we have to deal with reality. And that reality is that there are plenty of busy body liberals out there who want nothing more than to tell you how to live your life. These people gravitate towards positions in government, where they then have the power to micro manage every little portion of your life that they have no business to.
That is the plain honest truth when it comes to our perceived "rights" in this country. Public perception is what dictates what we can and can't do. Dealing with that reality is then what we are left with. Do you really think that you can argue your "rights" to metal detect on public property with the current established government in this country? No, being realistic you are never going to win that war. Instead, we are left with trying to avoid conflict (which you WILL lose) that involves input from local authorities.
Just look at gun laws these days. It says we have the right to bear arms, yet many places have put severe restrictions on gun ownership. For instance, in many places you must have a trigger lock on your gun in your house. What good does that do when you've got five seconds to unlock it and shoot an intruder in your home? Yet the very reason why laws like this were passed is because some idiot left a loaded gun in a place that was easily accessed by his children and then ended up killing somebody with it. Do I think a law such as this should be passed to prevent isolated situations like this? Of course not, as I'm sure MANY deaths were prevented by not having a gun lock on the gun where the person was able to defend their home.
My whole point is that with freedom comes responsibility. You can argue to you are blue in the face that you should be able to use a shovel on public land. In principal I agree with that view, but in reality I believe it is a non-winner in the public's eye. The people, uniformed as they might be, don't care how well you repair a hole or anything about your "ethics" in metal detecting. They see that nasty looking shovel or long handled digger you are using in "their" public park and feel offended.
In short, if we don't police ourselves there are PLENTY of people out there who would just LOVE to do it for else. To argue otherwise is keeping your head in the sand. If we don't take some simple steps to avoid conflict then we are only speeding out the eventual outcome. Sooner or later detecting WILL be banned in your area, like it or not. By taking a few simple steps we can at least slow down this process.
As a side note example, you do not have a right to drive a car. Once your physical condition becomes too degraded to drive a car the government will take away your "right" (actually it's a privilege and not a right) to. This is in the name of public safety. I would argue that the same thing applies to metal detecting. If you are no longer able to metal detect properly (in most people's view) then you should accept that fact and move on to something else. You do not have a right to metal detect public property (in the government's eye....I would disagree with that statement but we are dealing in reality here), and so if you can no longer do that in a capable fashion then do the hobby a favor and move on. You are not more important than the greater good of the hobby, just like a driver who no longer has the ability to drive in a safe fashion. There are bigger things than yourself. You have to consider your impact on the hobby because of your actions.
I would also argue that those who break the law have the same mindset. They believe nobody has the right to tell them where and when they can metal detect. As you can see, there is a line that is crossed at some point. Where do you draw that line? Do you believe you have the right to use a shovel on public land? What about somebody who can't walk and feels they deserve the right to drive a backhoe into an area to dig? You may feel this is a ridiculous example of extremes, but keep in mind there are those who feel using a shovel is also an extreme.
As I've said more than a few times, public perception is everything. Look at how hunting has been demonized by the media. If we don't take some simple steps to avoid negative public impressions then all we are doing is speeding up the process of being outlawed. It's going to happen, but we can take some common sense steps to slow the process down. I might not agree with the public's view, and I may very well feel that being American gives me the "right" to do what I want, but there is a reality in between that needs to be dealt with. And that reality is that using a shovel or long handled digger on public land WILL lead to a very negative public perception. To argue otherwise is to keep your head in the sand.
You may very well believe that this is American and so you have every right to use whatever kind of digging tool you want on public land that your tax dollars have paid for. In principal, being a conservative, I very much agree with that thought process. But being that we don't live in a perfect world, there are some very important things to consider before arriving at that conclusion. In short, we are faced with dealing with the "uniformed" public, and have to conform to behaviours that will be more acceptable to the public eye. Reason being that we have to think ahead, and what negative outcomes will happen if we don't do things to keep ourselves "out of the face" of the general public. If you deny that this is a problem to contend with then you are plain and simple fooling yourself. Go ahead, do what you want, and see how fast that gets you to the very thing you feared in the first place. You may be offended by me suggesting that you shouldn't use a shovel on public land, but think how much more you will be offended when you are banned all together from metal detecting there period.
Critterhunter said:Let me explain a little more on where I am coming from. I happen to be a conservative and so feel that government doesn't have the right to tell me how to do most things in life. I don't want people telling me what to eat, what to feel guilty about, where I can smoke, where I'm allowed to pray, how I should spend my money, and so on. I get rather upset about government sticking it's nose in my business when it has no right to.
On the other hand, we have to deal with reality. And that reality is that there are plenty of busy body liberals out there who want nothing more than to tell you how to live your life. These people gravitate towards positions in government, where they then have the power to micro manage every little portion of your life that they have no business to.
That is the plain honest truth when it comes to our perceived "rights" in this country. Public perception is what dictates what we can and can't do. Dealing with that reality is then what we are left with. Do you really think that you can argue your "rights" to metal detect on public property with the current established government in this country? No, being realistic you are never going to win that war. Instead, we are left with trying to avoid conflict (which you WILL lose) that involves input from local authorities.
Just look at gun laws these days. It says we have the right to bear arms, yet many places have put severe restrictions on gun ownership. For instance, in many places you must have a trigger lock on your gun in your house. What good does that do when you've got five seconds to unlock it and shoot an intruder in your home? Yet the very reason why laws like this were passed is because some idiot left a loaded gun in a place that was easily accessed by his children and then ended up killing somebody with it. Do I think a law such as this should be passed to prevent isolated situations like this? Of course not, as I'm sure MANY deaths were prevented by not having a gun lock on the gun where the person was able to defend their home.
My whole point is that with freedom comes responsibility. You can argue to you are blue in the face that you should be able to use a shovel on public land. In principal I agree with that view, but in reality I believe it is a non-winner in the public's eye. The people, uniformed as they might be, don't care how well you repair a hole or anything about your "ethics" in metal detecting. They see that nasty looking shovel or long handled digger you are using in "their" public park and feel offended.
In short, if we don't police ourselves there are PLENTY of people out there who would just LOVE to do it for else. To argue otherwise is keeping your head in the sand. If we don't take some simple steps to avoid conflict then we are only speeding out the eventual outcome. Sooner or later detecting WILL be banned in your area, like it or not. By taking a few simple steps we can at least slow down this process.
As a side note example, you do not have a right to drive a car. Once your physical condition becomes too degraded to drive a car the government will take away your "right" (actually it's a privilege and not a right) to. This is in the name of public safety. I would argue that the same thing applies to metal detecting. If you are no longer able to metal detect properly (in most people's view) then you should accept that fact and move on to something else. You do not have a right to metal detect public property (in the government's eye....I would disagree with that statement but we are dealing in reality here), and so if you can no longer do that in a capable fashion then do the hobby a favor and move on. You are not more important than the greater good of the hobby, just like a driver who no longer has the ability to drive in a safe fashion. There are bigger things than yourself. You have to consider your impact on the hobby because of your actions.
I would also argue that those who break the law have the same mindset. They believe nobody has the right to tell them where and when they can metal detect. As you can see, there is a line that is crossed at some point. Where do you draw that line? [size=large]Do you believe you have the right to use a shovel on public land[/size]? What about somebody who can't walk and feels they deserve the right to drive a backhoe into an area to dig? You may feel this is a ridiculous example of extremes, but keep in mind there are those who feel using a shovel is also an extreme.
As I've said more than a few times, public perception is everything. Look at how hunting has been demonized by the media. If we don't take some simple steps to avoid negative public impressions then all we are doing is speeding up the process of being outlawed. It's going to happen, but we can take some common sense steps to slow the process down. I might not agree with the public's view, and I may very well feel that being American gives me the "right" to do what I want, but there is a reality in between that needs to be dealt with. And that reality is that using a shovel or long handled digger on public land WILL lead to a very negative public perception. To argue otherwise is to keep your head in the sand.
You may very well believe that this is American and so you have every right to use whatever kind of digging tool you want on public land that your tax dollars have paid for. In principal, being a conservative, I very much agree with that thought process. But being that we don't live in a perfect world, there are some very important things to consider before arriving at that conclusion. In short, we are faced with dealing with the "uniformed" public, and have to conform to behaviours that will be more acceptable to the public eye. Reason being that we have to think ahead, and what negative outcomes will happen if we don't do things to keep ourselves "out of the face" of the general public. If you deny that this is a problem to contend with then you are plain and simple fooling yourself. Go ahead, do what you want, and see how fast that gets you to the very thing you feared in the first place. You may be offended by me suggesting that you shouldn't use a shovel on public land, but think how much more you will be offended when you are banned all together from metal detecting there period.