Also Goldstrike, you say:
Sure. Agreed. Fine. But what is the implicit statement you are making here? What is the inference ? HOLES, of course. (damage, etc...). Ok, then we simply DON'T leave holes. Do you leave holes? If so, fine, then don't go metal detecting. But so long as we're leaving no trace, then .... the implicit statement of what you're saying doesn't hold true or apply.
Might someone else who "sees the man with the strange machine and lesche" *think* you're about to leave holes? SURE. You can never 100% control what others *might* think. So go at low traffic times and avoid such lookie-lous.
Goldstrike said:..... Those facilities ..... we all expect to be free of holes/depressions and any anomalies.......
Sure. Agreed. Fine. But what is the implicit statement you are making here? What is the inference ? HOLES, of course. (damage, etc...). Ok, then we simply DON'T leave holes. Do you leave holes? If so, fine, then don't go metal detecting. But so long as we're leaving no trace, then .... the implicit statement of what you're saying doesn't hold true or apply.
Might someone else who "sees the man with the strange machine and lesche" *think* you're about to leave holes? SURE. You can never 100% control what others *might* think. So go at low traffic times and avoid such lookie-lous.