You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.
Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.
Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.
I'm not sure where this machine fits in exactly. Submersible, Smartfind and FBS2 trumps the explorer/etrac, unless it comes in at an extremely high price there will be no reason to buy an explorer/etrac. I am guessing there will be a glut of used minelabs in a few months.
All the rumors EMS put out were correct. I'd bet his pricing of 2500 Euros (over $3000 US !!!!) is correct too. I guess this is one model I will never own!
The problem I see is that the anticipated pricing will be too much for the average hobbyist/detectorist and it is this group of people that will always be the backbone of detector sales. Unfortunately, only a select few will feel justified in purchasing at this price point. I feel that the price must not break the $2000 barrier. The bulk of the technology is unlikely to have cost Minelab millions to develop and so the price should reflect that. GPS and Wi-fi chips are dirt cheap on today's market but because it is new (on detector's only) then they feel justified in charging a premium. FBS2 is a likely a software progression from FBS. Many will find a way to purchase this new machine but at what cost? (Pun intended). I am not knocking the machine's overall presentation and capability but just feel that their market objection is so profit orientated. I would think that a sub $2K price point would see so many of these machines walk out the door.
Tony.
All the rumors EMS put out were correct. I'd bet his pricing of 2500 Euros (over $3000 US !!!!) is correct too. I guess this is one model I will never own!
I only wish I had gotten the weight part. I can't believe how heavy that thing is! 5lbs! I wonder if the batteries can be taken off, even then, how could they possibly have made it heavier. I do wonder now if it has something else inside to cause that.
If it was one detector that could replace others, well it can replace a water unit, but not sure how fast it will be and it looks like the weight makes it prohibitive for many of us, me included.
All I can say is: "Thanks Minelab for making this so heavy that many of us can't use it. Thanks for listening to the customer." Big giant let down...
It all boils down to cost, weight, and technology differences to existing machines. For me to swing something that is reported to weight 5.5 pounds and cost over $2,000.00, it would have to be a hybrid land and sea machine that would rival the best machines in all conditions, excluding the GPX 5000. Give me something like that and I'll consider it. PS... They should sell it with a Swingy Thingy included.
weight listing, 5.5 pounds! Well I suppose this saves attaching a divers buoyancy belt to it when using in the water
Its far too heavy to be spending long hours in a field with. The Etrac is just over 3lb and that gets tough going after a few hours detecting. Is it any deeper than the e-trac? Why do we need GPS? Obviously Minelab think that we often get lost when out searching fields or beaches. It may have been a better idea to develop the E-trac and make it waterproof with the addition of FBS2. Its not bells and whistles we need... MINELAB DO YOU HEAR ME!