Michigan Badger
New member
Hombre said:Howdy Michigan Badger
Thanks for your thoughtful reply, I have been in this hobby fourteen years,a short time i'm sure from the reports of some of you OL' Heads in the hobby. But i have become a student in the art form of Teckt'n, in this short time that I have been doing this hobby I have tried to glean everything I could learn. From reading W&E Treasures to books written by Ty Brooks , CJC , Robert Sinclair and others . Then I go out in the fields and OLD homesights and pratice. You have to swing your coil over old and historic ground to find the things that make treasure magazine articles, and I am working on a story to submit to some treasure mag. The item I found was found with a Tesoro detector...........the great Toltec II. This machine may not be the deepest , but it is the detector I seem to make my greatest finds with.This is the key to succesful detecting, get to know your detector......period. HH ....................Hombre
Hope your article makes it into the mag.
You're so right about location. Lots of people hunt the same old easy sites over and over again and then blame the detector because they're not finding much. To make the finds one must pay the price. That usually includes travel and it always requires guts. Most people who do this hobby are too fearful to make any really great finds.
And too there's a lot more to a good detector than depth. I own some that are mega deep and I rarely find anything of value with them. They get masked out too easily and/or are unable to separate targets well.
You might laugh at this but I've found more at some sites with a Silver uMax than with a Tejon, Nautilus IIB, Sovereign GT, or Minelab Explorer II.