You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.
Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.
Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.
Pyledriver said:Crazyman, I know you from the Sovereign forums. Now I have nothing against you, but why do you come into the Garrett forum talking about anything Garrett unless you're grinding an axe?
Hype? Sure, it's called EXCITEMENT! A new Garrett! WOOHOO! Whether it does more or less electronically than 'any other' DOES NOT MATTER. It does more than the others just by it's waterproof aspect alone. The rest will be icing. My guess is it'll be bitter icing to the non-Garrett crowd!
This is getting fun-we're all 'atwitter' with expectation and excitement, and we have the snipers cruising around trying to pick us all off for what reason? At this point I want the detector to meet MY expectations. I suspect it will do that quite handily. What will be great to see is whether the AT will truly blow everybody 'else' away. I HOPE it does because that means we truly would have something new in the detecting world-not because my dog is better than your dog!
All you folks that are so wise as to the ways of fooling newbies with a 'parlor trick' that 'any detector can do', I'm glad you're so smart! Maybe we'll seek your advice before buying our next detector after the AT fails so miserably..
IS IT NOVEMBER YET?