This is always a hot debate in the hobby....the choice about "cleaning" coins or not. Well, I was very bored this week during "work", and was poking around on some other forums. Even the dumpo Of course I gut dragged into an arguement brewing about silver coin cleaning, & I tried to just make a quick point & say I'd prefer to leave mine alone. I also mentioned that I'd just read somewhere that the dark "toning" on silver is welcomed to serious coin collectors....more so than a shiney, or polished coin with no darker background left. Some guys call this "black stuff" tarnish, & wish to get it off to look more eye catching with stuff like vinegar, ammonia, baking soda, etc. I guess it's up to the particular person. Maybe they know they will never sell it? But, personally I'd rather leave my silver like this recent Bust Dime..."as dug". I think it looks good, but others may say it has tarnish/stains on it. I guess I just like to go by the old antiques rule of removing patina removes value & less can be more. Also, with the dime, I may be able to get it slabbed & it won't be branded "CLEANED" on the label. I ruined some buttons & large cents & now think less IS more. I have sold some of my finds so I'd rather have a buyer make the cleaning choice. My slave tags still have a bit a dirt on 'em still. But, I think this is good because there's so many fakes out there now & they are "as dug"....
This Barber quarter has amazing details with perfect background "tone".....
Anyhow, I'll stop rambling & hope nobody takes this wrong like some did over yonder. I'm just posting some picture examples & trying to convey what I choose to do, that's all....
This Barber quarter has amazing details with perfect background "tone".....
Anyhow, I'll stop rambling & hope nobody takes this wrong like some did over yonder. I'm just posting some picture examples & trying to convey what I choose to do, that's all....