Hi Leesumm,
I've owned a Quick Draw II and it is no better than the Lone Star in my openion.
Both the Lone Star and the Quick Draw II have factory preset ground balanvce.
That's part of your problem. BH calls it "Automatic Ground Trac". That's BH BS.
The 250 also has factory preset ground balance. But the 250 is a better machine.
Both the 250 and the Bounty Hunter have 2 filter operation, the 250 at 6.5 kHz
and the Bh at 6.6 kHz. They are semalar in some ways.
Too high of sensativity will cause the false signal sanerio you described with
either of these machines. But the 250 is a better machine.
Not being able to adjust to the ground conditions may be a porblem for you.
As I keep saying, the best for the money is the lowley $152 Compadre.
Nobody wants to give the sleeper a chance. I use it all the time. Works better
than my more expensive machines but with less depth. The depth of the Compadre
is comperable to the BH QD II and the 250. Performance, there's no comparison.
HH,
I've owned a Quick Draw II and it is no better than the Lone Star in my openion.
Both the Lone Star and the Quick Draw II have factory preset ground balanvce.
That's part of your problem. BH calls it "Automatic Ground Trac". That's BH BS.
The 250 also has factory preset ground balance. But the 250 is a better machine.
Both the 250 and the Bounty Hunter have 2 filter operation, the 250 at 6.5 kHz
and the Bh at 6.6 kHz. They are semalar in some ways.
Too high of sensativity will cause the false signal sanerio you described with
either of these machines. But the 250 is a better machine.
Not being able to adjust to the ground conditions may be a porblem for you.
As I keep saying, the best for the money is the lowley $152 Compadre.
Nobody wants to give the sleeper a chance. I use it all the time. Works better
than my more expensive machines but with less depth. The depth of the Compadre
is comperable to the BH QD II and the 250. Performance, there's no comparison.
HH,