Find's Treasure Forums

Welcome to Find's Treasure Forums, Guests!

You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.

Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.

Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.

Click here to register!



Need Support Help?

Cannot log in?, click here to have new password emailed to you

Changed email? Forgot to update your account with new email address? Need assistance with something else?, click here to go to Find's Support Form and fill out the form.

Why the GND Reading Doesn't Tell You "How Bad the Ground Is"

I thought it was mainly iron in the soil which caused most problems for vlf detectors? Would not high iron content in the ground then indicate "bad ground" or high mineralization in detector terms? Other than salt and iron, what other minerals interfere with vlf performance?And in such case, would not a smaller or dd coil be the better choice, when the mxt reports high ground numbers- after all such coils do see less ground volume? CC.
 
Good post. Some of it is above my head right now, But I surely appreciate the time you guys take to get this info out to us. Keep up the good work!

and as always we wish you
Luck Larry
 
Top