sandnsea49
Member
signal yet, or ever. In fact I dig very few iron targets at all. I use Andy's coin program and have no problems. I love my Etrac.
You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.
Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.
Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.
Goes4ever said:90% of the time I run my sens at auto+3....around here I get in the mid 20's. If I am on a clean site, like a ballfield I will use manual and crank it to 29-30. I feel auto +3 works best for me, old coins are rarely more than 7-8" in my area, and i can hit a 8" deep coin on sens of 19 easy. So no worries for me.
U will get more iron falsing if you run your etrac too hot as well, keep that in mind. But still if you turning 90 degrees and rechecking the target, using quickmask, etc.....you shouldn't be digging very many nails at all.
Goes4ever said:I would LOVE to see someone post a video where they get a CLEAR two way 12-46 on a nail......it has NEVER happened to me in two yrs of owning the etrac.
Scratchy signal yes, but clear solid signal, cant see it happening. Someone prove me wrong....post a video, include the signal with audio, and show your etrac screen, i bet it is a scratchy signal and being new to the etrac your just wanting a good signal and your thinking you have a good signal when in reality it is a walk away from signal....then dig it and ahow me what it is......someone please prove to me.
Goes4ever said:Neb, two way on 180 doesn't count in my opinion, because basically the coil is passing over it in the same direction, where in a 90 degree it is hitting it differently, make sense?
Goes4ever said:I think a lot of people try to turn a crappy signal into a good one. I have seen people walk around a target for 5 minutes trying to turn it into a good signal....lol
In all that time they could have just dug it and know what it is for sure!
nimbus said:Goes4ever, I love your comment, "I think a lot of people try to turn a crappy signal into a good one. I have seen people walk around a target for 5 minutes trying to turn it into a good signal". I'm so guilty of that. I've gone so far to help me ID targets and learn the meaning of the tones that I now carry my Fisher F5 with me to help me "verify" what my E-trac is trying to tell me.This might be helpful to those who only have virtual mentors if you have another detector that you understand well bring it along and use it as a concrete mentor to use in combination with all these great virtual mentors here on this site to compare target info.
I learned this, my E-trac can hunt ground where my F5 just overloads--man does that open sites that I thought were unhuntable. And because the E-trac can do that, I found a bunch of coins in what can only be described as a "nuclear waste landfill" because its so full of hot rocks. Memorial pennies were pinning as 50 cent pieces and silver dollars! No bull. the pennies were hitting perfect 1-39 through 3-40. I just about lost my zen utopia frame of mind on the 4th one that did that! The ground was so hot that the sensitivity, running auto +3, was barely visible on either graph! not to mention that the soles of my shoes were melting.
This might be helpful, though it's most likely understood, When using a coin program you discriminate out alot of "junk" that should Null when you pass over it, right? But that junk has some complex FE and CO properties that "trick" the E-trac to read them as good dig numbers. But since you discriminated out the majority of the junk's true TID information with the coin program, you only hear the high pitched sound and see the dig numbers, but if you listen to the sounds carefully they only chirp in and out just for a fraction of a second. Noticed that I quoted the word trick? The E-trac wasn't tricked in this case, we only misunderstood the message. When you truly swing over silver the sound will most likely be long and clear from both directions, fairly stable numbers and the same after you turn 90 and sweep again. I finally learned that this is what the Quick Mask mode is for and it has helped me see that the chirps that I hear in this case, are only a portion of the target that I programmed the E-trac to tell me about, because in full open quick mask- the numbers are all over the place with very high FE numbers. and if I wiggle the coil in just the right way I can "force" the E-trac to show me what part of that rusty nail has a 13-46 property. And when I dig that forced signal, its a nail.
I've heard that "thunk" so many times but have yet to figure out what the E-trac is telling me. I'm gonna learn this one on my own just to prove a point. so no spoiler posts please. LOL
Another piece of advice read Tom_in_CA's thread he so awesomingly took the time to author for me/us about understanding the tones with the E-trac.