Find's Treasure Forums

Welcome to Find's Treasure Forums, Guests!

You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.

Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.

Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.

Click here to register!



Need Support Help?

Cannot log in?, click here to have new password emailed to you

Changed email? Forgot to update your account with new email address? Need assistance with something else?, click here to go to Find's Support Form and fill out the form.

What is the absolute deepest detector you have ever seen. (In your humble opinion)

Can't Wait!!! Just got me a mid-80s Nautilus DMC VLF(the original DMC model). Gonna give this baby a whirl when the weather clears up and have a few sunny days. Heard these are (very) deep machines. They're actually the older i.b.(induction) balance type. Mine came with the 10" concentric coil.. Most modern machines use induction balance in the form of VLF except for the pulse and multi frequency type. All VLF are an offshoot of the induction balance types. You also had the older T/Rs(pretty deep if tuned correctly; ie; the Garrett Master Hunter ADS Deepseeker but was battery hungry; took 6 9-volts) and BFOs of which neither are used much anymore. BFOs, understandably so. They never went very deep but then again, in the 60s and 70s, much of the now foot-plus deep silver was near the top of the ground and most any detector, weak or powerful could have gotten a lot of the goodies back then. Even those old bulky 'tot', kiddie detectors were merciless on the silver near the surface, LOL. Nowadays it (DOES) take a (super) deep machine to find even some clad coins. Not uncommon to be digging 'zincoln lincolns' up to 8" or more in loose, dark, loamy-type river soils. So if these annoying pennies are found this deep, (imagine) how deep the remaining silver is, and (especially) the pre-1900s silver. Just think about that one for a moment.....There was a YouTube video of 1800s coins being found at a Dallas, Texas park, even after an 8" top layer of dirt was removed, another 7" down. 15" down total !!
 
NIBBLER said:
Blisstool.

Yes. Blisstool, in ideal conditions, is the absolute king of depth and will put even high power pulse machines to shame. But I have found the bliss to be very unstable and it's target Id/disc is lackluster. In my opinion, a last resort detector when no other machines seem to be finding anything.
 
For best depth with accurate target ID the CTX with the E-Trac a close second.
 
This reminds me of that old joke where two guys were standing on a bridge and both decided they had to pee. One guy says man that water is cold and the other guy responds yep and deep too. Which is my way of saying depth is a perception that seems to be different with everyone you ask. Is it scientific? nope but neither is pissing off a bridge:rolleyes:

mike
 
For extreamly small finds, depth goes to GPX 5000

For coin size objects, deepest would be GPX 5000 and both Blisstool V5 & Blisstool V6.

For larger targets, Two box.

Paul
 
So Far, I talked to my detecting buddies here in SoCal, and we have agreed to the following.

1(PI)GPZ 7,000
2(Garrett)ATX
3Blisstool ltcx6xs
4Minelab Musketeer
5Troy Shadow x-5
6Makcro CF77

That is only speaking of the detecors we use, there are many that we have never got our hands on that might be a bit deeper.
 
Fisher cz's.Next my teknetics t2.
That for coin hunting and identifing a coin or whatever type target.
I'm not into it will detect at 3ft in all metal mode,useless to me.
 
Top