Art (NWOH) said:
I can see your point for wanting a moderator to hang around to evaluate posts and threads for pinning at the top of the forum.
I got tired a long time ago at seeing the same questions asked over and over again. Sometimes the same question two or three times on the same page, and even only two or three threads apart.
And that's the entire point. Put it this way, we all know that I'm repetitive, that I repeat myself, that I say things over and over. (See
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/afc2b/afc2bb909691e9b6874efeaf98a6d9cc39743cf8" alt="Big Grin :biggrin: :biggrin:"
) One big bonus to a lot of people is that I might be less prone to do that. NOW who's on board?
Art (NWOH) said:
So what would a moderator have to do? Decide which subjects should be pinned and which should not.
And there in lies the politics. I admit that I'm not much of a "Politically Correct" guy. Can't stand people dancing around things and not giving an honest opinion. That's why I would
NOT be a good choice. But that one is easy to handle. Mark the links to opinions, views, and advice that some might not agree with like my "unconventional" ideas or others with a word of caution, village idiot alert, the exact wrong way to do things according to most Sane minded people...whatever.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/afc2b/afc2bb909691e9b6874efeaf98a6d9cc39743cf8" alt="Big Grin :biggrin: :biggrin:"
I have no objections to that. The problem is that one shouldn't be afraid of "alternative" opinions on a subject at hand. We're all grown ups here. Wait, let me think of that question in how it relates to me.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c4fb/1c4fb4a004ac374ae735c210f8560be0dce354ac" alt="Roll eyes :rolleyes: :rolleyes:"
(thinking...)
Oh yea, that's the point I was driving at...I for one don't consider myself right in every situation, regardless of how strong of an opinion I have. That's where ALL the ID charts for instance should be linked to for one example. More to the point and onto a good example...Let's take the great debate of max sensitivity providing best depth which is most people's view, VS something much lower than that providing best depth which we all know I believe in. Neither one is wrong. How can that be? Because it all comes down to which type of ground you have IMO. I just know that
in my soil max stable sensitivity doesn't provide best depth or target ID. In fact, it costs you that if you max out near the edge of stability.
By the same token, different soils for different folks can mean the highest sensitivity setting possible is going to provide that best depth. See how easy that is? Put a notation next to the various links to qualify the potential pros and cons of different "advice" or "how to" information. That's I think what they call being PC, isn't it? No body's wrong and no body's right. Can't we all just get along type of feel good nonsense that we are all supposed to believe these days "in the real world"?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6f7aa/6f7aadb9e982153dfda927b71bd0342873b859ba" alt="Cheek Kiss :cheekkiss: :cheekkiss:"
Somebody needs to be open minded enough to provide various points of views and let the people decide, unlike say the current state of colleges these days where only one side of the story is told. I'll stop right there since that's way off topic.
Art (NWOH) said:
On a lot of forums there are a lot of people who don't bother looking at the pinned topics. They just go ahead and ask the same questions anyway.
A lot of people will never go to a frequently asked questions section, or even look for it if it exists. Many people never do a topic search.
It will never end. HH
I'll say it again. Think about what you guys are turning down here carefully. Wouldn't you rather have me keep my responses to one short sentence, such as "SEE THIS LINK"?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/03219/03219ee7737819c0e01343cc75a31695c722d9d7" alt="Cheers :cheers: :cheers:"
That alone should be all I have to say.
Art (NWOH) said:
The usual moderator duties on most forums will be to delete spam, cool off hotheads, delete hostile posts, ban troublemakers. Usually not needed around this forum.HH
Now I have to think that one over real careful like, because I'm probably already about half way to getting kicked out the door as it is.
One other thing...I appreciate some people's beliefs in my knowledge about this machine but that's way over stated. I don't claim to be as experienced with this great machine as some of the legends in this forum. I'll never claim that, but I do claim to have some new ways of thinking about things or at least unique approaches that others may never have contemplated before. Big difference in those two things, so give credit to those who have earned their stripes over the years and deserve it.
The real deserving bunch all around would be new people to this great machine. They deserve better than the obscurity of the current state of this forum. That's who we need to think about.
Art, sorry I picked on your message. This response isn't really directed towards you in general. It was just a handy reply that I could bounce some ideas off of. Thanks for putting up with me.