You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.
Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.
Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.
Was looking at Nokta ad well. Seems the simplex on par with vanquish and legend on par with Nox if correct?Nokta simplex is a great detector at a great price.
I agree, I guess comes down to features like waterproof, rechargeable batteries, bluetooth, ground balance lol, etcI think you will find that in reality the simplex and vanquish will find most of the targets that the more expensive models will in most conditions......you don't have to spend mega money to get great performance.
I watched a great video made over here in the uk where a detectorist took a top flight model and a basic model to a field he had never searched before.Whatever target he found he checked with the other machine and the basic model found every signal the top of the range machine did.I'm not saying the top flight model wouldn't find a few more targets over a seasons detecting but in reality a good basic model will find most of the targets a really expensive one will.
Yes easy to get caught in the hype.Bud,i've owned that many detectors over the years i can't remember them all.I've tested them on proper test beds....ie,targets that have been buried for a long period of time and the conclusion i have come to is this.......the best detector you will ever own and have the most success with is the one you enjoy using the most.
Now i might be looking at either Nokta or Ml simex vanquish legend NoxYes easy to get caught in the hype.
Swing with what makes you the happiest I guess
Vanquish is better on the beach!Was looking at Nokta ad well. Seems the simplex on par with vanquish and legend on par with Nox if correct?
Having hard time convincing myself with straight shaft and control box on top detectors though. Was one thing not crazy about the xterra i had. The s curve ones just seem alot more comfortable
Unfortunately its the only one not waterproof but I guess if they made it waterproof they wouldn’t sell as many Nox’sVanquish is better on the beach!
Thats how manufacturers keep getting our money.........they never quite make a great value detector that is good at everything.Unfortunately its the only one not waterproof but I guess if they made it waterproof they wouldn’t sell as many Nox’s
Hey MonteI agree with most of what Nauti said, especially not needing the most expensive, and using a detector that works well that you like.
I will add this, having owned 3 Vanquish 540 Pro Packs and 4 Simplex + .... I would take a Simplex + over a Vanquish without hesitation.
I will also add, do not count Garrett out. The Apex is a wonderful SMF with optional Single Frequencies and it has served me well since first introduced.
Monte
Sorry read it wrong simplex is vlf and apex smf.I agree with most of what Nauti said, especially not needing the most expensive, and using a detector that works well that you like.
I will add this, having owned 3 Vanquish 540 Pro Packs and 4 Simplex + .... I would take a Simplex + over a Vanquish without hesitation.
I will also add, do not count Garrett out. The Apex is a wonderful SMF with optional Single Frequencies and it has served me well since first introduced.
Monte
Thats very interesting to lnowMost detectors in use today, for a long time, and into the future are Single Frequency. I have 9 detectors right now and only one offers SMF operation and that is an Apex. And I do not always run multiple.
Most SMF operate on two frequencies, the White's V3i and VX3 can operate on 3 frequencies.
Not always going to out outperform all the others. SMF can be okay but they can also be out-performed.
Monte
That's called marketing.Thats very interesting to lnow
I always assumed running multiple frequencies at a time was always better than just one. At least thats the way they advertise it. Better at finding more stuff in same area
The best of both worlds i suppose would be a detector that operates both on smf or the option of using just one not sure if any of the current detectors do bothThat's called marketing.
Frequencies can be a reason for EMI, or for impaired performance in some ground environments, and also weaker performers on some metal types. An SMF might be using a couple of frequencies that therefore could result in impaired results rather than better. Through the years of using various SMF's I noted frequent times when some Single Frequency models were the better performers. Still can be today, for some applications.
Monte