Find's Treasure Forums

Welcome to Find's Treasure Forums, Guests!

You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.

Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.

Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.

Click here to register!



Need Support Help?

Cannot log in?, click here to have new password emailed to you

Changed email? Forgot to update your account with new email address? Need assistance with something else?, click here to go to Find's Support Form and fill out the form.

Using Polar Plot to Distinguish Between Types of Targets.

http://www.findmall.com/read.php?66,1192324,1192335#msg-1192335

http://www.findmall.com/read.php?66,1320364,1323085#msg-1323085
http://www.findmall.com/read.php?66,1192324,1201550#msg-1201550
 
The diagram shows that the -95 area can wrap around to the plus side. I see more of the +95 side wrapping to the negative when dealing with deep coins or lower sensitivity settings do to EMI when the coins are in the 7 to 9 inch range in depth. I have my doubts if the polar plot is any more functional at depth than the conventional analyze screens. If I get the chance I will have a hunting buddy stop by with his V3i and hit my coin garden to test, He is 60 miles from me so I will have to wait for the opportunity. I definitely have some coins that wrap all th way to the negative.
 
"One caveat for the polar plot of course - the deeper the target, the more ground has an effect on the signal which will affect the curve on the polar plot. (Same as with all information on the detector - it's still not a magic wand for the deeper targets)."

Here is a quote by AK_1234 from an above link. The straight lines will be affected by depth.
 
I have read things that reference a "ferrite bead" as a point of reference for designing the disc on a detector... I think it was in an article by John Gardiner.

Is -95 on the V3/V3i the setting for a "ferrite bead" or would it be 0 (90 on the 180 scale ie: the point where it changes from ferrous to non-ferrous)... or am I confused?

Anyone?

J
 
Yes, you and Neil are correct. I asked Carl and he said the raw phase is from 0 to 180. 0 is pure ferrite and 180 being a pure conductor. I have more questions that I am waiting for answers.
 
Anne from White's will be posting some interesting information, Neil was almost 100% right.
 
Larry asked me to chime in here. So here goes...

The detector only reports VDIs converted from positive phase angles (0 to 180 degrees). The negative angles aren't valid assuming that the machine is calibrated correctly. In the ground probe screen, you may see negative angles if you are holding the coil in the air so there is no real signal coming in - just noise, or you haven't zeroed it first. Once you zero the machine and lower it to the ground, or read your target, your phase angles should come in between 0 and +180 (as with anything there will be exceptions - ground conditions, noise, what have you). A ferrite bead will come in very close to 180 degrees (-95 VDI) which is close to where most normal ground comes in and pure conductors will come in around 0 degrees (+95 VDI). Salt water (wet beach, or fields with lots of fertilizer and wet) comes in close to 90 degrees (0 VDI). Approximate numbers.

Jeff Foster's diagram shows the VDI's. Relating angles to it, -95 VDI = 180 degrees, and +95 = 0degrees. 0 to -180 degrees are invalid (note my caveat above...)

I see that the V's angles are reversed from one of the charts here. I was taught these angles when I got here, so that's how we got these angles in the V. It's really rather arbitrary on the axis orientation. It could easily have been 0 = ferrite and 180 = a silver dollar (or thereabouts). It's just a matter of how you define your axis - it sounds like Carl has defined his opposite to V's from what Larry said. I really only mentioned it since the ground probe screen has the angles set up as I described.
 
One of the reasons Anne was talking about the negative Phase numbers is because I asked about them. I have seen them on the V and in the owners manual in the picture at the bottom of page 21 of the ground probe shows negative numbers going as low as -154. I thought there must be the -0 to -180 Phase section because I have seen them....:confused: Goes to prove, don't believe everything you see........:drinking:
 
Larry (IL) said:
One of the reasons Anne was talking about the negative Phase numbers is because I asked about them. I have seen them on the V and in the owners manual in the picture at the bottom of page 21 of the ground probe shows negative numbers going as low as -154. I thought there must be the -0 to -180 Phase section because I have seen them....:confused: Goes to prove, don't believe everything you see........:drinking:

That screen cap must have been taken when the coil was held high in the air as per her explanation.
 
n/t
 
A UK member here (Sorry...can't remember who?), said the polar plot was a real quick way to determine coke from coin. Haven't been back to a few places where it's a big problem but going to get back to 'em to check it out.
 
nw1886 said:
A UK member here (Sorry...can't remember who?), said the polar plot was a real quick way to determine coke from coin. Haven't been back to a few places where it's a big problem but going to get back to 'em to check it out.

In the US this is not an issue. The lowest VDI for a coin is a nickel at a VDI of 19. Most other coins are in the 50-80 range. Coke hits close to a VDI of 0 and can jump from approximately -30 into the low teens. I dig a fair amount of coke because sometimes it turns out to be a button.

Next time I am out I will test the V3i on coke.
 
Hey Neil, maybe what I'm finding isn't coke then. What does coke look like? I was told it was and maybe was just informed wrongly? (It could just be melted metal?) Anyways... these places have the potential to be loaded! Thanks for the clarification!
 
Coke is primarily carbon, refined coal so to speak. It is used mostly to fuel blast furnaces and it looks and feels like hard coal.
 
nw1886 said:
Hey Neil, maybe what I'm finding isn't coke then. What does coke look like? I was told it was and maybe was just informed wrongly?


Doooh!

:crazy:
 
[attachment 184553 2011-01-12_113337.jpg]
 
Top