Neil in West Jersey
New member
During yesterday's outing one of my focuses was on the use of the Analyze screen on deep targets. In the past I was using Analyze to confirm what I already knew. For example, when I found a target that gave a 78 VDI at 5 inches, I used the analyze screen to confirm that I found a dime. I was actually costing me time. Rather than dig, I was analyzing. Lately I found myself using it less and less.
Last Saturday I discovered something by accident when I found the gold jewelry that I posted. It was nearly 7 inches deep just beyond the edge of the discriminate mode so all I got was the hum of the All Metal channel (using Mixed Mode), with an occasional chirp on the positive side of the scale. Certainly a good target to dig when working old sites with many deep small targets. I decided to see how the Analyze screen handled it. ( I have it set to the default Analyze settings, but "Match Search" is unchecked). It took a few swings to get a readout, but when it appeared, it was a nice smooth hump with 7.5 being the dominant hump. This confirmed to me that it was a diggable target. Had it been iron, 22.5 Khz would have been the dominant hump. Needless to say, at this site and on deep targets, I would dig it anyway.
During yesterday's outing I planned on using analyze to confirm iron. I dug plenty of flat nails, and they always had 22.5 Khz as the dominant target.
So how can this be a benefit? Sometimes a target will give the threshold change, but jump into the 80's or 90's on the VDI scale. If the target has a dominant hump showing 22.5, it is most likely iron. If 2.5 KHz or 7.5 Khz was dominant, it would be a diggable target.
Last Saturday I discovered something by accident when I found the gold jewelry that I posted. It was nearly 7 inches deep just beyond the edge of the discriminate mode so all I got was the hum of the All Metal channel (using Mixed Mode), with an occasional chirp on the positive side of the scale. Certainly a good target to dig when working old sites with many deep small targets. I decided to see how the Analyze screen handled it. ( I have it set to the default Analyze settings, but "Match Search" is unchecked). It took a few swings to get a readout, but when it appeared, it was a nice smooth hump with 7.5 being the dominant hump. This confirmed to me that it was a diggable target. Had it been iron, 22.5 Khz would have been the dominant hump. Needless to say, at this site and on deep targets, I would dig it anyway.
During yesterday's outing I planned on using analyze to confirm iron. I dug plenty of flat nails, and they always had 22.5 Khz as the dominant target.
So how can this be a benefit? Sometimes a target will give the threshold change, but jump into the 80's or 90's on the VDI scale. If the target has a dominant hump showing 22.5, it is most likely iron. If 2.5 KHz or 7.5 Khz was dominant, it would be a diggable target.