Find's Treasure Forums

Welcome to Find's Treasure Forums, Guests!

You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.

Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.

Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.

Click here to register!



Need Support Help?

Cannot log in?, click here to have new password emailed to you

Changed email? Forgot to update your account with new email address? Need assistance with something else?, click here to go to Find's Support Form and fill out the form.

Understanding the X-Terra Ground Balance system and adjustment.

Jerry,

You are welcome anytime. I'll even show you the hot spots for jewelry. they get replenished often! :biggrin: We could compare the 1270 and X-5 for wading up here too. Dang I wish the 1270 had adjustable GB in disc mode. Oops..sorry to bring up GB issues. :lol:

Tom
 
All of us who enjoy the hobby read and/or post on the forums for various reasons, but in the end we have one thing in common ....

:detecting: :detecting: WE ENJOY THE HOBBY!! :detecting: :detecting:

In the end, that's really what you and I both prefer to do rather than argue and, if I ruffled a feather I apologize. My X-Terra 70 and Shadow X5 are presently my two most-used models, and for good reason. They work well and compliment each other in several ways.

As for the Ground Balance discussions, they, like any other, can cause some tension at times that I am sure could be easily put to rest if the two or ??? parties involved in the discussion were able to chat face-to-face and hands-on demonstrate what they are expressing. It can help all parties to learn.

That's why my seminars are generally a two-day affair. The Saturday session is a full-day classroom environment with explanations, Q&A, demonstrations, etc. Sunday starts with a Q&A session (everyone comes back with more after going home and playing with their detectors) and then the rest of the day is spent afield where we get hands-on, in-the-field use which often makes what we try to convey in word more clearly understood.

That said, let me just touch on this in reply to your response:

"In mild ground you have to increase (make more positive) the GB adjustment to get to the point of neutral response compared to more mineralized ground."... You lost me on that. I will say that in some very neutral to mellow ground you have to increase the GB much more positive to get to the point where you can hear a change in the GB setting that would be more positive, while if you are hunting in a "bad ground" environment you only have to adjust only a little increase in GB to hear a positive GB change.

"Given that the Ex-terras are set up a little differently that still however holds true. If Hot ground balances out at a low number you would never get a good balance in mild ground as you would run out of adjustment range before you got there. Don't have to be a rocket scientist to figure that out is is just plain ole logic."... The beauty of the X-Terra 70 for some of these types of discussions is that it features both Auto GB and Tracking GB and if we let the electronics handle that adjustment, we don't get into the manual GB debate.

Once the Auto or Tracking GB setting is established, in a nearly neutral to mellow or moderate ground environment, we can see that it is displayed as a larger GB reference number and that suggests to us that the ground is not as mineralized as it would be if a smaller (lower) number setting was necessary.

From either one, once established, a manual adjustment one or two numbers lower (lesser number) would result in a slightly positive GB to an aggressive positive GB, which doesn't seem to do work that well with the X-Terra 50 or 70.

"You have stated many times that your ground balances at 3-4 on the 50 and around 14-15 on the 70."... Yes, most of the toughest locations do. Some of the nicer parks allow a GB in the mid-40's with the X-Terra 70, but the worst places I tend to hunt are tougher to deal with.


"Well so does the ground in my area and it is NOT highly mineralized or what I consider even moderately mineralized."... I think that is a key. The level of mineralized ground might be one thing, and what an individual interprets as being mineralized can be something a bit different.

I think that most people who hunt sites like yours or mine and require such as low-number setting with an X-Terra, or something in the 78-85 range with a White's MXT, would agree that this represents some higher mineralized ground conditions.

Keep in mind, too, that I am referring to inland ground and not any salt water beach type of environment.

"Either one of us is totally wrong on this issue or...the number you balance out at is meaningless as far as determining the amount of mineralization present. for sake of good relations I'll go with the latter.".... To eliminate the urge to :argue: more about a sometimes frustrating topic, we can both be :angel: :angel: and just put it behind us.

I think, however, that mineralization factors, and the appearance of the mineralization can play a big role in this. I hunt some sites that have identical or nearly identical GB readings (MXT) or require similar Ground Balance GBAT numbers, yet one site has more compacted material and the other is loose material even to the point of being like a nicely plowed field. But they can not be hunted the same. One might require a slower sweep speed, a lower Discriminate setting, and some other variables ... even though the GB required for the two bad sites is the same.

There are just way too many dynamics to make all comparisons work out similar, because not just circuitry design and how the manufacturer opts to process the signal is the same. Search coil dynamics also are important in many conditions.

"I have posted this type reply to you twice in the past and you totally ignore them."... Sorry! I try not overlook any posts that are directed to me specifically and apologize.

"there is a ton of mis-information being posted ont he Ex-terras on this forum and I hope you guys have good luck with your books."... I plan to and, I agree, there is some misinformation, or let's just say an ample amount of confusion. :D

"Me, I'm about done with the mess and will stick to hunting with my "freebie" X-T 70 which is by no means any ground shaking revolutionary detector. It is a good all around machine that will please most people." I won't say it is ground shaking, but I will say it is refreshing because it does offer something new from Minelab in a light-weight unit. It does offer a lot of very useful features and in an easy-to-adjust package. And, in my opinion, the X-Terra 70 is today's best "multi-purpose" TID detector for the $$$. But then I also feel the Shadow X5 is the best NON-TID "multi-purpose" detector for the $$$. Sadly, one is new and in production and the other isn't. :(

"My last tip. If you hunt iron, use 2 tones with tracking on and the elliptic DD coil if you want to be competitive with other detectors."... I still need to get the DD coil. I wanted to work with the three 9" concentric coils while on vacation, especially, as well as the audio tone options. Most of the time I am hunting in 2-Tones but sometimes go with the Multi-Tone option in some settings. It's really great to have the easy-to-change options for audio tones the X-Terra 70 provides.

"My last post on the subject!"... Okay. :)

I am out for some morning hunting then I have to work, but I'll have the next three days off and the wife's given me the OK to spend my birthday doing what I want, and I extended that to Monday & Tuesday as well by including a get-away to Central Oregon for some detecting over there. Now, if our weather would only cooperate.

I hope you can get out and enjoy a search or two my friend, and good luck!

Monte
 
The T2 put that myth to rest.

Other manufactures have said the same thing when we listen to them. Whites has stated with both the DFX and MXT that the gb number is not indictative of mineralization strength, nor is the phase number indictative of mineralization strength. Using the DFX, a user has to go through a fairly complicated process to get some idea of mineralization strength.

To say that you can get an indication of ground mineralization by the gb number displayed by the Xterra 70 is false and misleading unless you stay only within the broad range of stating salt vs ferrous.

HH
 
Hi Mike,

I have been following the posts on the T2 and have a question for you.
Have you notice a difference in the Fe readings between the dry ground and after some good rains? From what I have been able to find it appears that saturated soils exhibit lower magnetic susceptibility. Maybe thats part of the reason we seem to get better depth after a good soaker???

Tom
 
This is a general response to TF, Professor Hillis, and the Savage.


http://www.findmall.com/read.php?55,341201,341723#msg-341723

Was an attempt to show that the act of GB'ing has two components. Adjusting the GB which shifts the discrimination scale so that the ground is not mistaken for a target. The ground can tend toward being more conductive, magnetic, or a combination of both. BUT that GB point does NOT tell you how much(quantity) magnetic or conductive material is in the ground. And this(quantity) is what affects depth the most, and the falsing created by this portion of the ground response is dealt with by the sensitivity adjustment.

i.e. You can GB at 25 on the X70 in two different locations, yet not get the same depth on identical targets.

I was trying to think of an analogy for this, and this is the best I could come up with. If you are using a camera to take a picture, there are two adjustments you have to worry about, Focus and Exposure. I liken the Focus to the GB adjustment(shifting the disc response)to get a clear/detailed picture. And the Exposure to the sensitivity setting, not enough exposure and you get a dark poorly defined image, too much exposure and the picture blooms with a big blob of an image. Run your sensitivity too high in highly mineralized ground, and you (over expose) the amplifiers in the metal detector. I guess what I am trying to say is the amplifiers see a big blooming effect which overwhelms them.

And just as Focus and Exposure vary widely from photo to photo(indoors & outdoors), so do soils(GB & sensitivity).

My second post: http://www.findmall.com/read.php?55,343744,343744#msg-343744

Oddly enough relates to Tom's wet ground statement. Water liquefies the salts in the ground which make them more conductive and can improve signal transfers.

HH
BarnacleBill
 
Monte,

Perhaps the whole issue should be left to the engineers and geophysicists. Like you, I primarily care only that the detector works and the Ex-terras are fine machines. I much prefer the 70 over the MXT which I had a couple of, for general hunting and it appears the prospecting mode is no slouch either!

Added a couple more IH's to the collection yesterday using the LF coil. :biggrin:

Up in my neck of the woods there are no big or old parks to speak of so its rural hunting at its finest... tracking down the old homestead that no one else has gotten to before and fighting the iron for what has been missed by others at the more obvious older sites.

HH and glad to see you are able to get in some quality detecting time.

Tom
 
Jackpine,

I do notice a difference with moisture content, even humidity.

Case in point, today I was in dry sand that GB at 92 with a .3 (5bar)on the FE meter. Last time I was in this same spot was two months ago in very dry weather, the GB number was 89 and if I recall correctly the Fe meter was only a .03-.1

Then again, I had recently sent in my T2 for the R6 enhancement update and a coil calibration, so I may not be comparing apples to apples. Something I will continue to track though.

HH
 
Good analogy with the camera, too.

HH
 
The ID Edge got the IH's. The X-T 70 with the LF coil picked up a 26 Merc and 2 early wheats. Must be gettin old! :biggrin:

Tom
 
if you haven't mentioned yours to Minelab. Although I am still putting the final touches on "Coin Shooters Guide to the X-Terra", the folks at Minelab have been aware of my project for several months. Once completed, I've requested that it be posted on their website, to read or print out, FREE of charge.
HH Randy
 
n/t
 
Top