Ytcoinshooter
Well-known member
That's the key question. In a nutshell: because we are a results oriented society. I'll explain my thought on that.wasp said:Ytcoinshooter said:Out of 140 members in my club I know only one other member for certain who usues the V3i. I can count a few who tried it and sold it.
HH - Bruce
Bruce, why do you think this is?
One member who went from the DFX to the V3i kept saying he was "fustrated" , "not finding anything anything deep". He said would set the V down and grab his DFX so as to find something so his hunt wasn't a waste. That alone doesn't say much, I am interested why expirenced detectorists give up on the V. BTW He went to the CTX3030 and loves it. That's got a learning curve of its own but probably was clearer to him or it took less tweaking to get the results he wanted. I've witnessed him have success at natural find hunts with it. He brought up a nice 1 real at a decent depth on a farm field. He was beaming! Sure wish I could have checked that signal before he dug it. In talking to him about his frustration with the V3i before he sold it I was asking him about his filter choices and a few other related setting that directly affect performance. By his response I now know it is related to understanding the menus and tech - principals by which a metal detector operates. It's no knock on him. In our results oriented society people expect a computer to behave as an appliance. So to dig into the nuts and guts of how things work to get something optimized isn't to everybody's liking. So as the V3i is concerned it's the operators ability to be that interface between the detector and what's in the ground we are seeking.
There are times I too like simplicity. Sometimes I will opt to use another detector in some applications if I know it will be effective and take less effort to set up or I may prefer some characteristic of the other detector that I want to utilize.
There are probably as many answers to your question as detectorists who gave up on the V3i.
HH - Bruce