Well first off the F5 is gone....shortest ownership record for me...48 hours. Basically it suffers from the same interference issues as the first T2's ....accept 10 times worse....seriously. I could not run the gain above 3 without a constant 1HZ pulsing beep. Tried alternate frequencies....checked everything. It id this at several locations out in the middle of the desert...no power lines..no aircraft..no cell phones on either of us..nothing. The person I was with shut of his XLT..no help. He did not have a cell phone on him and even so we were a hundred feet apart.
Funny thing was the frequency of the pulse would change with which ever alternate Freq i would choose...it would speed up to 2HZ at the next Frequency and then speed to maybe 3HZ at the last...but none of the alternate frequencies reduced the intensity.
I had to lower threshold to -3 and gain to 2.....this is pointless as you might as well give it up...which I did.
So I called Cabelas and they said send it back...or I could take it to the Cabelas in Glendale Az..which I did. Bye Bye...CYA......sorry bro's but this is the 4th FT detector in 3 years that has failed for interference issues.
Now on the brighter side I did get to use it for 5 hours and test it out...I just had to listen to a mind numbing pulse and try and hear around it.
Now I found that in tones 1 and tones 2 you DO HAVE a threshold in discriminate. Howver 3 and 4 are silent search. This is great as I like to have this option.
I did like tones 2 which is similar to the dual tone option on the T2 and f75. Iron is a low growl and everything else is a medium tone. plus you have a VCO response in disc according to target size and depth. This would be great for relic hunting and if I were using it for that this is the mode I would use..Tones 2.
As for target seperation and ability to handle iron the unit was above average. We hunted extremely nasty homstead sites with as much iron as I have ever run into back east. It handled it like a champ. Even with gain turned down to minimal amounts the depth was still decent.
If they can stop this continual interference issues with these units the F5 would be a great machine. Hopefully it is just due to the fact that I had the first run of F5's.
It has alot of potential and is a huge step above the F4 and for not much more money either.
I would suggest caution buying ANY f5's until dealers get them and get to try them first.
By the way the machine did not false like that at my home but when i got back it was doing it here to...actually it started doing it above a gain of 7...then soon anything abobe 6...then 5...then 4 and finally anything above 3. I think maybe a circuit failure was to blame as it slowly degraded throughout the day until it became worthless.
Anyway it is now at Cabelas.
By the way they had an F70....I checked it out...almost bought it......but being a guinea pig once in a single month is enough for me. Considering every FT machine released in the past3 years has had interference problems I figured the F70 would just dissapoint me if it did it too.
For now I need a machine that is not a wuss when it comes to noise and will have to defer to another manufacturer. But dang...the F5 has potential.
Scott
Funny thing was the frequency of the pulse would change with which ever alternate Freq i would choose...it would speed up to 2HZ at the next Frequency and then speed to maybe 3HZ at the last...but none of the alternate frequencies reduced the intensity.
I had to lower threshold to -3 and gain to 2.....this is pointless as you might as well give it up...which I did.
So I called Cabelas and they said send it back...or I could take it to the Cabelas in Glendale Az..which I did. Bye Bye...CYA......sorry bro's but this is the 4th FT detector in 3 years that has failed for interference issues.
Now on the brighter side I did get to use it for 5 hours and test it out...I just had to listen to a mind numbing pulse and try and hear around it.
Now I found that in tones 1 and tones 2 you DO HAVE a threshold in discriminate. Howver 3 and 4 are silent search. This is great as I like to have this option.
I did like tones 2 which is similar to the dual tone option on the T2 and f75. Iron is a low growl and everything else is a medium tone. plus you have a VCO response in disc according to target size and depth. This would be great for relic hunting and if I were using it for that this is the mode I would use..Tones 2.
As for target seperation and ability to handle iron the unit was above average. We hunted extremely nasty homstead sites with as much iron as I have ever run into back east. It handled it like a champ. Even with gain turned down to minimal amounts the depth was still decent.
If they can stop this continual interference issues with these units the F5 would be a great machine. Hopefully it is just due to the fact that I had the first run of F5's.
It has alot of potential and is a huge step above the F4 and for not much more money either.
I would suggest caution buying ANY f5's until dealers get them and get to try them first.
By the way the machine did not false like that at my home but when i got back it was doing it here to...actually it started doing it above a gain of 7...then soon anything abobe 6...then 5...then 4 and finally anything above 3. I think maybe a circuit failure was to blame as it slowly degraded throughout the day until it became worthless.
Anyway it is now at Cabelas.
By the way they had an F70....I checked it out...almost bought it......but being a guinea pig once in a single month is enough for me. Considering every FT machine released in the past3 years has had interference problems I figured the F70 would just dissapoint me if it did it too.
For now I need a machine that is not a wuss when it comes to noise and will have to defer to another manufacturer. But dang...the F5 has potential.
Scott