ronhob said:
I am debating which model I would get to be strictly used with the clean sweep 3x18 for quick coin retrieval in large areas. I used to have a Bigfoot coil on a DFX I owned, and I loved it for that.
Of the Tesoro model line, I like the Tejón, generally, but personally prefer many of the non-H.O.T. models a lot more, and have for over 32 years. As for area-of-search size, I can't, physically, endure big sites anymore, and while I have hunted a lot of sports fields and big parks, etc., in the past, I much prefer to hunt renovation and other urban places, and mostly enjoy getting away to more out-of-the-way and highly littered [size=small](especially iron)[/size] locations.
Tesoro's set a standard long ago by which I compare all other makes and models for dealing with iron nail infested sites, such as homesteads, encampments, old building tear-down or burned-down locations, ghost towns, etc. For the bulk of my fifty-plus years of detecting I have enjoyed using smaller-than-stock search coils, and have most of my Tesoro's so outfitted today to get the best performance out of them.
As for other search coils and how they best perform, I have not been and still am not enthused by the CleanSweep Coil.
"Quick coin retrieval" is really more a matter of the operator's skill at isolating [size=small](pinpointing)[/size] a target then quickly and skillfully recovering it. You might be referring to Quick Coin
Locating, and that can be different based upon the coil used, but also upon the site ground mineral environment and the particular detector used.
For example, you mentioned using the similar-sized BigFoot coil on a White's DFX. Well, honestly in that case I didn't care for the coil or the model, but the DFX was derived from the XLT which was one of my all-time favorite White's detectors. The DFX and XLT, like their 6000 Pro XL, 5900 & 6000 Di Pro SL and similar 4-filter models, were designed to handle mineralized ground better AND they operated best with a moderate to fast sweep speed. Thus, they were good picks for Quickly
Locating coins in large, open spaces. So, your DFX/BigFoot combination were handier for quickly hunting a site.
There are, or have been, some very functional 3-Filter type detectors on the market, too, such as the former Compass Scanner series, or the current White's MX5, M6 and MXT Pro models. This design concept provides the benefits of a faster-sweep speed in bad ground, like the DFX, XLT, XL Pro, but also a quick-response, more like you get from a Teknetics Omega, Makro Racer or, naturally a Tesoro.
However, if using a 22-filter, aka Double Derivative, circuitry design, you can do a rapid target motion back and fort past the search coil ...
IN THE AIR ... and get a quick response, but when these types of detectors are swept over mineralized ground, especially more iron mineral challenges ground, like pea gravel, dark mineral sand, or just bad dirt, they are at their best with a slow and methodical sweep speed. If swept quickly, like a DFX & BigFoot, you will lose depth of detecting as well as good target response, even on shallower targets.
I have had my best open-area searches with many Tesoro models using either a stock round 8" Concentric coil, or the 8X9
'OOR' [size=small](slightly Out-of-Round)[/size] Concentric coil, and honestly just about match that general performance with a 6" or 7" Concentric coil. Why? Because to not miss a deeper-located smaller target, like a dime or penny, you need to overlap no more than the diameter of such a smaller target. Therefore, ALL coils should be advanced about an inch once you've swept left and then right over the same spot before being advanced the tiny amount for maximum coverage.
ronhob said:
I am leaning towards getting the outlaw with 3 coils, and adding the clean sweep coil to it.
The Outlaw with 3 coils is sufficient and I wouldn't add the CleanSweep.
ronhob said:
I think I could also find good use of the small concentric and possibly the larger DD.
The 6" Concentric coil is the primary coil for best performance, in my opinion, and I keep that coil, I have three of them now, on three of my Tesoro's. One on my Bandido II, and one on my quick-grab microMAX models, the Silver Sabre µMAX and Bandido II µMAX. My Eldorado keeps the stock 8X9 Concentric mounted, but I am shopping for another 6" concentric for it.
The larger 10X12 DD coil? It's for sale, or I'll trade it for another 6" Concentric. I have no use for the bigger coil, especially a DD due to the trashier sites I hunt.
ronhob said:
If not, I could always sell the coils I don't prefer using.
Yep.
ronhob said:
Once again, I have plenty of other machines that I can choose from for older sites,...
If so, then you ought to have a model that can be used efficiently with a faster-sweep in an open area to
"Quickly Locate" coins. I'd suggest nabbing a good Tesoro model to complement them by having a detector/coil combination that would excel in iron infested sites, trashier environment, hunt close to metal structures and fences, etc. Take advantage of the Tesoro strengths, that's at I do, and will put one to work later this afternoon in a fun semi-competition hunt ... with 6" Concentric coil.
ronhob said:
... so I am mainly thinking of searching larger areas quickly to get max. coinage and coverage. Anyone have this set-up? Pro's Con's?
I do hunt big areas quickly with a Tesoro at times ... using the Threshold-based All Metal mode, but for peak "quick search" capability, I'd suggest a model designed for faster-sweeps in mineralized environments.
ronhob said:
Does the clean sweep swing nicely, or does it get to feeling like a brick on the end of a stick on the tesoro's ? Thanks for any help.
For ME, the CleanSweep and most of the bigger coils, to include the 8X9 when the Coil Cover is added, are more nose-heavy when it comes to balance and control.
ronhob said:
Well, I am taking into consideration that I may like it for other uses as well.
Tesoro's are, in my opinion, great for "other uses" than quickly searching big areas for coins.
ronhob said:
I don't know much about the Tesoro line, but I have read a few of Monte's post's about them, and I am sure that they do well in the iron with the small coil, and a big DD would certainly find some deep coins if I were to decide to use it for that.
Yes, I do tell you the Tesoro's do excellent in iron, especially with a smaller-size search coil. I will never say that a Double D is a good pick if you're looking for deep coins. I have found more deep coins with a Concentric coil than a DD coil on makes ands models that are designed to handle both coil types.
ronhob said:
I am at a bit of a cross road on whether to go cheap, but fruitful, or to spend more and get more options in case I want them after all.
Not knowing what other makes and models you currently have, it is hard to make any good suggestions, but I own more thsan one brand so that I can complement my Tesoro's for certain features and selected applications.
ronhob said:
Correct me if I am wrong, Tesoro currently only produces and sells these 4 micromax machines: Cortes, Deleon, Silver Umax, Outlaw- (That work with the cleansweep)
The actual "microMAX" [size=small](µMAX)[/size] name assignment is only on the Silver µMAX currently.
The Compadre, Outlaw, Cibola, Vaquero use the same smaller-size micro-housing, but they are not labeled a microMAX. The Tejón, DeLeon and Cortés use a slightly larger-size control housing.
Personally, I was glad to see Tesoro drop the µMAX reference on newer models, like the Cibola, Vaquero and Outlaw, because the little 'micro' symbol .. µ .. is not a lower-case letter .. u .. and too often people call these models YOU MAX and it drive me nuts! It's a 'micro' symbol to say microMAX.
But yes, those are modsels that would use the CleanSweep coil. Of them, however, I would only suggest the Outlaw because it provide manual GB to control performance of both the All Metal and Discriminate mode, and with Tesoro models you can run in to problems using accessory coil that are not a proper match for the detector's preset GB.
ronhob said:
I gather that the bandido, golden umax, silver sabre, and a few others, are no longer made?
Correct, but don't think that "no longer in production" means they "no longer work." Look at the Tesoro models in my current carry arsenal and you'll note they are all former or discontinued, no longer in production models, and each of them works excellent! matter-of-fact, my suggestion to you, if shopping for a good Tesoro to add to your detector battery, is consider the current offerings, but don't hesitate to shop for one of the excellent units they used to make.
ronhob said:
I like the idea of having a pinpoint and some tones.
All of my Tesoro's and other detectors have an All Metal Pinpoint function. Very useful. Only one model I currently have features any form of visual Target ID or audio Tone ID, and, while these features do have a time and place where they might be useful, Tone ID definitely isn't a must-have to get reliable performance. In many sites I hunt, I much prefer having a very clean and informative single-Tone audio response.
ronhob said:
Some kind of notch disc might be nice too, if I went with a higher dollar machine.
Notch Discrimination, to me, is close to useless. Too many good, desired targets can fall into the wrong 'notches' or 'segments' due to depth, position, ground conditions, and nearby masking trash.
ronhob said:
How many tones does the Outlaw have, and are they awesome , or just ok?
One Tone and it is 'OK.' For some it is fine, but I like a little higher or sharper-sounding audio pitch, but the Outlaw audio is fine.
ronhob said:
I also wonder how high the discrimination can be set on these machines? It looks like maybe Max is past Zinc penny?
You can adjust them higher than Zinc cent rejection, usually, but why? Most Indian Head cents and many early Wheat-back cents from 1909 tom about 1920 have a similar conductivity reading, as do many older coins [size=small](like the US Half-Dime)[/size] and many good jewelry items and keeper artifacts.
Just some thoughts. Now I have to find someone to jump by battery as I forgot about the lights I had on and charging the computer and am stuck in a Carl's Jr. parking lot.
At least I can laugh at myself ... I guess.
Monte