Find's Treasure Forums

Welcome to Find's Treasure Forums, Guests!

You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.

Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.

Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.

Click here to register!



Need Support Help?

Cannot log in?, click here to have new password emailed to you

Changed email? Forgot to update your account with new email address? Need assistance with something else?, click here to go to Find's Support Form and fill out the form.

THE NEW MAKRO RACER - COMING SOON!

Thanks, sounds good!

Any plans to release a fully dedicated waterproof/underwater machine that competes with the current crop of top-of-the-line VLF or PI beach machines?


Nokta Detectors said:
icurabeachguy said:
Is it waterproof? Can it handle the saltwater as well or better than the current crop of dual/multi-frequency VLF machines? Us beach hunters have been waiting a long time for someone to dethrone the Excal and CZ for beach & water work...

The coils are waterproof. It has a beach mode that is ideal for beach hunting.
 
both, depending upon a person's interpretation of 'notch' Discrimination.

D&P-OR said:
Notch disc on the Racer--or just "progressive" disc?
"Progressive Discrimination" would be what we have generally been used to since it was first introduced, where you would start at the lowest Discrimination setting, then rotate a knobbed potentiometer to slowly progress on up the range of rejection. This type of 'Progressive' Disc. adjustment was used on most of the earlier TR-Disc. and VLF-Disc. [size=small](motion-based Discriminators)[/size] using a variable analog Disc. circuitry design.

I still have the 'old style' Progressive/Variable Discrimination on my Teknetics Omega, Tesoro Bandido II µMAX and Outlaw, and White's MXT All-Pro. I like a good 'Progressive' Discrimination adjustment range because I never use more rejection than just enough to barely reject common iron nails laying on the ground.


"Notch Discrimination," as it was originally designed, would be a separate variable Notch Disc. knob adjustment that would move a 'window' of rejection [size=small](or acceptance depending upon the detector)[/size] separate from the Primary Disc. setting. But since that early Notch Disc. concept we have had a few newer types of 'Notch' Disc. designs offered to us.:

1.. Factory designed Notch Disc. 'groups' or 'set windows' based upon conductivity 'ranges', such as 'Iron' then 'Foil' then 'Nickel' for the USA 5¢ coin, then 'Pull Tab' for the early ring-pull type tabs. Then some models added even higher 'Notch' ranges such as 'Screw Caps, then 'Aluminum', Zinc Cents [size=small](USA Zinc Pennies)[/size], and some 'Notches' for higher-conductive USA coins like 'Dimes' and 'Quarters'. Many made today have segments that don't adjust higher because Halves and the older large Silver Dollars are not in abundant circulation or frequently found.

Some makes and models, such as my Teknetics Omega, let you accept or reject one or more of these larger Notch groups. That 'Notch' Disc. option is there, but I never use 'Notch' based on this concept.

2.. Models such as the White's XLT, DFX. VX3 and V3i have, perhaps, the widest range of independent 'numeric Notches', which range from -95 to 0 to +95. This brought us the often referred to VDI for Visual Discrimination Indicator that could be more closely assigned to some specific targets. The 191 number adjustment spans the range from mineralized ground through small, lower conductive targets and on up to the higher conductivity setting possible. With those models, the operator can accept or reject any specific single VDI numbers they want. The trick is knowing what such varied adjustments can ... and can't ... work in the real world.

I have my own three Custom Programs loaded in my White's XLT, and every one of them Rejects all VDI numbers from -95 through -41, and Accepts all VDI numbers from -40 through +95. For me and my style of detecting and the performance this model gives me, that's all the Discrimination I want or need. No 'Notching.' Some people will Accept and Reject some strange groups of VDI numbers that they feel suits their taste and that's fine, we each make our own decisions on what works [size=small](or seems to work)[/size] for us.


"Segmented Discrimination" is a design where the Discrimination adjustment range, from the particular models acceptance range on up through the designed highest Disc setting, is broken down into specific 'Segments' which can also be referred to as 'Notches.' We saw that with models like the Garrett GTA series with little squares or blocks. Most of the time the little square 'Segments' let us Reject or Accept predetermined 'Notch Segments,' and models can have maybe 8 'Notch Segments' like the White's Coinmaster Pro, 9 'Notch Segments' as found on their Coinmaster GT, or 20 'Notch Segments' like on my MX5.

Garrett's GTI 2500 has 24 'Segments', and Minelab's X-Terra 705 has 28 'Segments.' Then there is the Garrett AT Pro which has a more variable Iron range adjustment, followed by 12 'Segments', or the before mentioned White's models with 191 numeric 'Segments.' NOTE: With these types of detector models, using the little 'Segments' or 'Notches,' these different blocks can serve two purposes. One is to indicate a visual VDI numeric or Target ID range, and they are also used for Discrimination adjustment.

Some makes and models allow the operator to Reject [size=small](Discriminate)[/size] only several of the first [size=small](lowest reading)[/size] sets of 'Segments' or 'Notches', while other makes and models allow you to Reject or Accept any number of individual 'Notch Segments.' Thus models like my White's MX5 allow me to Progressively increase my Rejection to just knock out most iron nails with the first 3 'Notch Segments', and Accept the upper 16 'Notch Segments.' Others might want to 'Notch Discriminate' a few 'Segments' that would eliminate pull tabs and screw caps.

As I stated, I have no use for Notch Discrimination, or really using very much rejection at all. I like to adjust just enough to maybe help deal with some ground mineral issues or to just barely reject iron nails. Nothing higher than that, with the only exception being to reject wet salt beach responses, if I don't have a detector so designed to handle those conditions [size=small](with a wet salt beach GB compensation)[/size].

So, to answer Del's question [size=small](for newcomers or those a bit confused by Discrimination and terms used)[/size], unless we hear a final Operator's Manual description otherwise, I believe the Makro Racer will have a Discrimination design similar to the Nokta Fors Coin and Relic. The Co/Re and Racer have a Target ID display that provide a Numeric Read-Out [size=small](often referred to as a VDI number)[/size] that can run from 0 to 99. The operator can relate the Target ID reading to a colored graphic scale along the top that suggests a general range of conductivity associated with the Target ID.

The Nokta Fors CoRe has an adjustment called ID Masking. The Makro Racer photos show the term ID Filter. These controls are the Discrimination adjustments that will allow an operator to 'Progressively' Discriminate unwanted targets by increasing, from a lower setting, up through the Target ID conductivity numbers [size=small](in essence 'segments')[/size] similar to using the "old fashioned" variable-adjust knobbed potentiometer.

Therefore, NO, it doesn't seem to allow any 'windows' of Secondary Discrimination Notches or Segments contrary to the Primary Discrimination adjustment, just a Progressive Primary Discrimination setting as most of us are used to. Honestly, I am glad to see a progressive numeric reference called Target ID, and to also have a full-scale adjustment that allows us to reduce it to '0' for a true Zero Discriminate setting. I search that way quite often in addition to a Threshold-based All Metal mode.

Sorry to ramble and I hope I haven't confused anyone with my descriptions. I know that many newcomers don't know what 'Notch' is and my response here was to maybe help the novice hobbyist. People like Del [size=small](D&P-OR)[/size] and others with time in this great hobby already have a handle on standard Progressive Discrimination Vs Notch Discrimination. If I confused anyone, please shoot me an e-mail to: [email subject=Monte]monte@stinkwaterwells.com[/email] rather than clutter this good Forum with a lot of chatter [size=small](or arguments ;) )[/size].

Monte
 
Hello Monte and Happy New Year,

There is nothing to indicate that the Racer will be much different operationally from the CoRe and in fact the Nokta rep has pretty much said that would be the case in posts. The big difference is the physical layout and probably some performance tweaks. I therefore believe you have got it right.

Notch is a funny thing. I think it was more useful back when finds were easier to make and we could be pickier about it. And the other thing of course for a lot of people this is supposed to be a fun hobby. If using notch makes things fun for them then I think it serves its purpose. I think the only right way to detect is the way that makes it fun, and that is very different from one person to the next.

I generally dig everything or use bare minimum ferrous rejection like you do, so the Nokta/Makro system works great for me as I want the full use of the discrimination range. Too many detectors truncate the ferrous range or only allow for a few segments of adjustment. A big gripe for me on the MX5 is the decision to go from a variable adjustment to a notch system. It probably works just fine in practice but it is not an improvement in my opinion, nor the decision to remove trac lock.

But I digress. Being an oddball type the only use I have for notch these days is to employ a reverse disc knob. Coins do not float my boat as much as gold so I need a progressive disc knob that goes the other way! I start at silver dollar and have to decide how far down to go. My V3i allows me to eliminate silver dollar down to zinc penny. I just dig all the targets under zinc penny. If mens rings may be around I may have to allow the zinc penny range.

If the area may be a good spot for women's rings I can drop down all the way to nickel range and basically go after foil range targets. The reality is that the manufacturers as usual are all stuck in coin detecting mode. When it comes to jewelry value, the case can be made that the whole VDI scale thing is basically backwards. What I need is a knob that starts at the top and turns down! And lacking that knob that is where I find machines like the V3i useful. However, I get close enough with the FORS in three tone mode and just going after mid-tones.

Anyway, I am finding the FORS with small coil to be a deadly little sniper and so will be curious to see what you think. The fun part is the company also listens to users (what a concept) and I bet if you and I get on them we can get a small concentric built. I bet you would like that!

I am convinced that FORS and Racer are just the very start and that we are dealing with a company that will listen to suggestions as crazy as a reverse disc knob (just give Racer the ability to set the ID Filter in reverse) and consider it instead of every other manufacturer that will just not consider anything that does not fit their preconceptions of what a metal detector is. The next generation of machines from Nokta and Makro will be the ones to get really excited about - in my opinion.

Happy Hunting Monte and Good Luck this Year!
 
If the Racer and the Fors Core are the same machine in different layouts, I guess the Racer will be a $1000.00 +/- machine.
 
I'm curious if the Racer and the CoRe will be able to share the same coils ? And if the Racer will have the ability to lock the ground tracking like on the Core ?
 
jimz49 said:
One other thing, will there be a review of the detector published before the release date? It would be very beneficial to hear opinion(s) and read the results from top testers a head of the scheduled release.

Garys forum will have the first tests
 
cadman_us said:
If the Racer and the Fors Core are the same machine in different layouts, I guess the Racer will be a $1000.00 +/- machine.

Wondering to pricepoint as well.
 
mtsheron said:
cadman_us said:
If the Racer and the Fors Core are the same machine in different layouts, I guess the Racer will be a $1000.00 +/- machine.

Wondering to pricepoint as well.

i dont know how true it is but I have read in the $600 range
 
OregonGregg said:
I'm curious if the Racer and the CoRe will be able to share the same coils ? And if the Racer will have the ability to lock the ground tracking like on the Core ?

Hello.. Racer and FORS will not share the same coils. Yes, Racer does have tracking feature as well.
 
any photos of the wifi phones available ?
we are all gagging for the racer as if its the same as the core on finds we will be well pleased
better get ramping up manufacturing as you may usurp the XP crown soon ,who would buy the GMP at 795pounds and the deus when the racer is half the price .its a no brainer
get busy with the soldering iron i have a big wedge in my pocket )))
 
a test review will be on Garys site fairly soon now
 
Top