Find's Treasure Forums

Welcome to Find's Treasure Forums, Guests!

You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.

Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.

Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.

Click here to register!



Need Support Help?

Cannot log in?, click here to have new password emailed to you

Changed email? Forgot to update your account with new email address? Need assistance with something else?, click here to go to Find's Support Form and fill out the form.

Something New, & its P.I.

The can vs the aluminum is such a joke. He has merely assembled a cluster of gold rings, that amount to a size and conductivity that is different than the can he waves. Hence nothing more than notching of sorts. Which is NOT telling aluminum apart from gold. And which will leave you woefully un-prepared when waltzing out into junky blighted parks thinking you're going to only go for gold.

I bet that at the point where he compares the can to the gold rings, that I could indeed come up with an aluminum object (cut the can up into slaw, or assemble a collage of tabs and foil, etc...) that would indeed read exactly as his cluster of gold rings read.
 
they should be commercially available to rent.
As Tom said-its notching,
Until I see it, use it to satisfy myself [or until money printed on my computer is legal] -its no sale.:ban:
Guver-Mint greenbacks stay in my wallet.
 
John-Edmonton said:
Never trust any manufacturer that builds or promote a LRL, as pictured below. They have failed 100% of the time in double blind tests, scientific, both in the lab and out in the field

Don't think this is a LRL.
Where's what it states on their web site:

It’s antena includes 2 sensors gradiometer antenna for very accurate scans of the underground.
 
either stacked or side by side-its not a gradiometer.
And those things, per se are not metal detectors. The measure magnetic fields-and things that
cause that to change are generally ferrous in nature.
I have used one, and a gold brick will not cause it to change 1 gamma.
 
That's old hat. You need "The Best Gold Detector 2017 Gold Radar"! Musically presented by the MWF Group in a 4:30 video. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_waksraMem8
 
vlad said:
either stacked or side by side-its not a gradiometer.
And those things, per se are not metal detectors. The measure magnetic fields-and things that
cause that to change are generally ferrous in nature.
I have used one, and a gold brick will not cause it to change 1 gamma.

ahhh, but you see, it must therefore be "un-discovered" science. Betcha can't refute that ? :sadwalk:
 
if I stuck most if not all my detectors over a shallow 1KG 999 Gold bar they would overload , so I think there is a lot of misinformation out there about how metal detectors really work....

AJ
 
This video did it for me. It is indisputably scientific and legitimate. After all, didn't you see all the $20 high-sounding words they pepper through-out the video ? Tsk Tsk.

Especially after I choose the "gold only" setting, I'm going to be laughing at you guys all the way to the bank ! Muhahahaha ! :super:
 
Science? (Like metaphysics-magic?) Seems more related to philosophy.
You listen to Coast to Coast AM??? :beers:
 
vlad said:
.... You listen to Coast to Coast AM??? :beers:

ah yes. I have indeed. Late night radio @ 2am, eh ? The host takes calls and promotes all kinds of believer's stuff. Like I recall the call from the fellow who saw a Pterodactylus fly by his car windshield. In upstate New York backroads in the middle of the night. Who can argue with personal testimony eye-witness stuff like that ??
 
on the S. border--must have been loosed by the reptile men that live underground :drool::look:
 
Top