Charles (Upstate NY)
Well-known member
A couple other silver sucking machines that post here on occasion also use conductive tones
Find's Treasure Forums
Welcome to Find's Treasure Forums, Guests!
You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.
Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.
Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.
Click here to register!
Need Support Help?
Cannot log in?, click here to have new password emailed to you
Changed email? Forgot to update your account with new email address? Need assistance with something else?, click here to go to Find's Support Form and fill out the form.
Screen locations of iffy signals
- Thread starter Charles (Upstate NY)
- Start date
Hard Nosed Dave
New member
This diagram that you have shown us speaks heaps.
A similar diagram/s being posted by I think, Mike Moutrey a few years ago and also many of your posts and instructions, that make mention of the fact that the bouncing of targets when they occurred, are most possibly a good deep target.
To me, it's not been as pertinent-a-fact until more recently. I still never paid too much attention to these variations until recently while I hunted on some beach sites( the sand is SO much easier to dig and investigate). Yes, those iffy bouncy signals can be very deep good targets. I tried it in an air test and noted targets that are just in
range of the Explorers detection field can be good targets when they produce such a result.
This behavior is evident even in an air test, BUT the target will behave similarly in the field. As far as the sensitivity adjustments in conduct or ferrous with other variability's go, it's going to be difficult to explain given a sites iron infestation and how that infestation of iron relative to a targets location is going to affect it.When I first got the Explorer, i hunted the front yard that had been gridded with ferro/galvanised re tic pipes. The grid boxes where about a yard square and down about 12 inches plus. I think about how many goodies I missed by not paying attention to sensitivity reduction in order to achieve a stable or just stable THRESHOLD when searching in such areas.
Now that you've have made mention of, I just wish I hadn't allowed myself to be reminded of such variations being possible good targets.........'cause I have to go back over very many sites and start looking for these similar reacting patterns......in CONDUCT.
.
Thats going to take another six yaers to do
Thanks for this great info....regardless of that possibilty
David Di
A similar diagram/s being posted by I think, Mike Moutrey a few years ago and also many of your posts and instructions, that make mention of the fact that the bouncing of targets when they occurred, are most possibly a good deep target.
To me, it's not been as pertinent-a-fact until more recently. I still never paid too much attention to these variations until recently while I hunted on some beach sites( the sand is SO much easier to dig and investigate). Yes, those iffy bouncy signals can be very deep good targets. I tried it in an air test and noted targets that are just in
range of the Explorers detection field can be good targets when they produce such a result.
This behavior is evident even in an air test, BUT the target will behave similarly in the field. As far as the sensitivity adjustments in conduct or ferrous with other variability's go, it's going to be difficult to explain given a sites iron infestation and how that infestation of iron relative to a targets location is going to affect it.When I first got the Explorer, i hunted the front yard that had been gridded with ferro/galvanised re tic pipes. The grid boxes where about a yard square and down about 12 inches plus. I think about how many goodies I missed by not paying attention to sensitivity reduction in order to achieve a stable or just stable THRESHOLD when searching in such areas.
Now that you've have made mention of, I just wish I hadn't allowed myself to be reminded of such variations being possible good targets.........'cause I have to go back over very many sites and start looking for these similar reacting patterns......in CONDUCT.
.Thats going to take another six yaers to do
Thanks for this great info....regardless of that possibilty
David Di