Find's Treasure Forums
Welcome to Find's Treasure Forums, Guests!
You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.
Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.
Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.
Click here to register!
Need Support Help?
Cannot log in?, click here to have new password emailed to you
Changed email? Forgot to update your account with new email address? Need assistance with something else?, click here to go to Find's Support Form and fill out the form.
Question on White's new GTI detector????
- Thread starter Bob (OHIO)
- Start date
i know one thing this machine has me waiting,and waiting,and waiting
vlad
Well-known member
Instead, they built the low powered P.I. with no features-compare IT to the new detector.
Yes, it is NEW IN THE "SENSE" THEY ARE MANUFACTURING IT UNDER THEIR NAME.
But they hired ERIC to work for them getting their version of the GOLDSCAN design correct.
And as ERIC was working for them, the new mono loop which is a 12" outer coil with a 6" inner coil, which he designed,
was patented by Whites. As to whether it will be digital or analog, what is the point of going digital?
I asked Eric 2 years back why he did not go digital and he said there was no need, and there were
some definite benefits to being analog.
I've known ERIC 26 years and have his phone # if you want to talk to him. I was one of the 2 field testers of
his first Gold Scan in the U.S. back in 1983 or so, when Tony Spooner was his U.S. representative.
But be careful if you start asking technical questions about P.I.'s, because he can bury you so deep it will take
GROUND RADAR to find you.
You still have not answered my question: will the WHITES' PULSE be able to adapt to the AFTERBURNER,
which is a something that increases TX gain in the loop [more depth] which adapts to Eric's GS design,
and can be purchased by the individual for their detector? {Every one always wants the most depth possible.}
[Eric is still working on the AFTERBURNER and it is not completed yet, but will be soon.]
I vet my facts.
Yes, it is NEW IN THE "SENSE" THEY ARE MANUFACTURING IT UNDER THEIR NAME.
But they hired ERIC to work for them getting their version of the GOLDSCAN design correct.
And as ERIC was working for them, the new mono loop which is a 12" outer coil with a 6" inner coil, which he designed,
was patented by Whites. As to whether it will be digital or analog, what is the point of going digital?
I asked Eric 2 years back why he did not go digital and he said there was no need, and there were
some definite benefits to being analog.
I've known ERIC 26 years and have his phone # if you want to talk to him. I was one of the 2 field testers of
his first Gold Scan in the U.S. back in 1983 or so, when Tony Spooner was his U.S. representative.
But be careful if you start asking technical questions about P.I.'s, because he can bury you so deep it will take
GROUND RADAR to find you.
You still have not answered my question: will the WHITES' PULSE be able to adapt to the AFTERBURNER,
which is a something that increases TX gain in the loop [more depth] which adapts to Eric's GS design,
and can be purchased by the individual for their detector? {Every one always wants the most depth possible.}
[Eric is still working on the AFTERBURNER and it is not completed yet, but will be soon.]
I vet my facts.
steve herschbach
New member
Hi vlad,
Because numerous prototypes have been in the field being used. White's takes the feedback, and works with Eric and people in-house to improve the unit based on the suggestions. Then more prototypes get built, and more field tests. I'm not sure what you mean by "so many years". How many years should it take?
I never said Eric is not working for White's. Yes, there are some patents being filed by White's. I would not doubt Eric had a hand in it. What is your point?
I never said the White's unit would be digital. I doubt it will be but I do not know.
I've communicated with Eric as part of the project. He was kind enough not to bury me and was very helpful with my questions.
Since you know Eric so well and since Eric is working on the Afterburner it seems Eric would be the one to ask about that subject. Since when do I owe you answers about anything anyway?
All detectors proceed from what came before. Yes, the White's unit is based on the Goldscan. But White's is not taking a Goldscan and sticking a White's label on it. The unit is being rebuilt from the ground up and there is nothing left of the original unit. If that is not new enough for you then so be it.
Steve Herschbach
Because numerous prototypes have been in the field being used. White's takes the feedback, and works with Eric and people in-house to improve the unit based on the suggestions. Then more prototypes get built, and more field tests. I'm not sure what you mean by "so many years". How many years should it take?
I never said Eric is not working for White's. Yes, there are some patents being filed by White's. I would not doubt Eric had a hand in it. What is your point?
I never said the White's unit would be digital. I doubt it will be but I do not know.
I've communicated with Eric as part of the project. He was kind enough not to bury me and was very helpful with my questions.
Since you know Eric so well and since Eric is working on the Afterburner it seems Eric would be the one to ask about that subject. Since when do I owe you answers about anything anyway?
All detectors proceed from what came before. Yes, the White's unit is based on the Goldscan. But White's is not taking a Goldscan and sticking a White's label on it. The unit is being rebuilt from the ground up and there is nothing left of the original unit. If that is not new enough for you then so be it.
Steve Herschbach