Option idea: Reverse Audio response

[Smooth23]

Seems like this would take a software engineer at XP about a coffee break to implement. There's plenty of sites where I exclusively hunt the deep stuff. I'd love to make the audio response backwards. So deep stuff comes in loud and shallow stuff comes in quiet. Simply put, when the amplitude of the frequency response is large, audio is low, and vice versa. Thoughts? Please XP, see my silly request and make it happen!

 

[IDXMonster]

That actually does sound like (envisioning this in my tiny mind) just “hookin’ the wires up backward”, right? Like you said, weak signal=LOUD, strong signal=QUIET. It does SEEM like something that wouldn’t be difficult….but I also begged for a year for ML to put a CLOCK on the EQX...

 

[BigTony]

Seems like this would take a software engineer at XP about a coffee break to implement. There's plenty of sites where I exclusively hunt the deep stuff. I'd love to make the audio response backwards. So deep stuff comes in loud and shallow stuff comes in quiet. Simply put, when the amplitude of the frequency response is large, audio is low, and vice versa. Thoughts? Please XP, see my silly request and make it happen!

Difficult to accomplish due to, ‘Just not thinking out of the box’! It is the same for all manufacturers not just this one

 

[Rockford]

Yes it would be easy. Until then, your ears trained to faint signals can work.

 

[Wild Willy]

This seems to be the right place for this comment so is there any way to get plain ole' discrimination to work in the RELIC program. IAR just doesn't get it for me. I think the option would be wonderful. Is it available and I don't know about it? It would not be the first time I learned something new about the D2. I also realize it can't be everything for everybody. Comments appreciated.

 

[Odanscoils]

I don't know. Garrett did just that on the Grand Master series. That I believe carried over to the GTI 2500. Surface Elimination. 20 yrs ago.
Can't be that hard.
On my old Grand Master Hunter CX 3.
It goes to 4-5 inch's of elimination.

 

[GKMan]

If only.... I hunt a lot of parks during the week, I could care less about clad so I am only listening for weaker deeper signals.
Unfortunately, I have not found a setting I like that doesn't have the shallow targets shattering my eardrums. Nonetheless, I can still pick out the deep targets I am going for..

 

[Tony-Ok]

The audio that provides modulation, or apply audio response feature on the D2 work’s excellent to give you the faint high tones . I was trained by ear with the Fisher CZ detectors using modulation. It is second nature for me. It can be for you also. HH Tony

 

[Tony-Ok]

If only.... I hunt a lot of parks during the week, I could care less about clad so I am only listening for weaker deeper signals.
Unfortunately, I have not found a setting I like that doesn't have the shallow targets shattering my eardrums. Nonetheless, I can still pick out the deep targets I am going for..

Set your audio is comfortable with the shallow signals, then concentrate on the soft high tones. It’s doable with headphones.

 

[Wild Willy]

Smooth23, I really like your idea. I'm sure most of the iron I have to deal with is shallow (close to the surface) and could be delt with your idea. Anyone know if XP engineers read this forum?? Sure hope so.

 

[Smooth23]

Even easier: the same setting could be used just let it go negative. -6 to 6, with a negative value deamplifying strong signals.

 

[xindaris]

Seems like this would take a software engineer at XP about a coffee break to implement. There's plenty of sites where I exclusively hunt the deep stuff. I'd love to make the audio response backwards. So deep stuff comes in loud and shallow stuff comes in quiet. Simply put, when the amplitude of the frequency response is large, audio is low, and vice versa. Thoughts? Please XP, see my silly request and make it happen!

Would like to see XP, Minelab and Nokta have a program with this feature.