You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.
Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.
Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.
I call BS to that.Long term experience with ones detector of choice will out perform the latest tech in the long run, always has always will.
I can sort of get behind this, but then again if it improves enough to vastly improve things it would probably be worth it. I know plenty of people loved and still love the deus, and now that its waterproof and multi-frequency, i would consider the deus 2 enough of an improvement to move on to if you weren't happy with your current detectors. same thing with the nokta simplex to the legend. Also just for me, im currently happy with my arsenal, it does want i need and want it to do, but improvements down the road are possible.Long term experience with ones detector of choice will out perform the latest tech in the long run, always has always will.
I thank god that we live in america, where everyone is entitled to there opinion, and people are not forced to think one way or anotherI call BS to that.
I guess ignorance is bliss
u2robert, why are you on a campaign to get everyone into what you think is the latest and greatest? Everyone has opinions and some times its best to keep them to ones self. HH jim tnI call BS to that.
I guess ignorance is bliss
I agree with you somewhat, but to assume all your old sites have coins that are masked is reaching I think...Not my saying but a good one to fit this topic,,,,inexperienced detectorist buy new machines,,experienced detectorist find new places to hunt.Yes, and the reason is the processors are faster making for target separation which = unmasking target that have gone undetected by slower old fliphone detectors.
This opens up old "detected out" sites to newer faster detectors.
Another words the older slower detectors see 2 targets as one because it's not fast enough to distinguish between the two whereas the new detectors are fast enough to see both targets
On top of that the adjustable iron bias settings is also a big help in unmasking
But it might be there and but not found because?Y’all can do all of the comparisons,masking demonstrations and show how machine X is better than machine Y but what it all comes down to is simply”If it ain’t there you aren’t gonna find it”.
True but I have gone back to sites that have been detected out because the metal detecting club cleaned it out.I agree with you somewhat, but to assume all your old sites have coins that are masked is reaching I think...Not my saying but a good one to fit this topic,,,,inexperienced detectorist buy new machines,,experienced detectorist find new places to hunt.
u2 you sound ticked off and offended. Why?I call BS to that.
I guess ignorance is bliss
I have done the same.. sometimes I wonder if ground freeze and thaw lifts them up to the surface,or maybe they tilted and the freeze untilts them? Or it could just be a better machine like you said..no right or wrong answers, if you got the loot and want a new release I'd say go for it, ill be watching your reports as well as others..Good luckBut it might be there and but not found because?
True but I have gone back to sites that have been detected out because the metal detecting club cleaned it out.
Went back years later and found some good finds
It will always be that way, no matter how many people or machines hit itTrue but I have gone back to sites that have been detected out because the metal detecting club cleaned it out.
Went back years later and found some good finds
I too believe this occursI have done the same.. sometimes I wonder if ground freeze and thaw lifts them up to the surface, or maybe they tilted and the freeze untilts them
In plowed fields it would be normal, but not in "virgin" fields. I don't know if it's erosion, frost, rain... but it happens.Frost heave, or deep plowing maybe if in a field?
The soil is dynamic,not static.There are many factors that cause the soil to constantly shift,moving objects that are contained within it.Like you i have found objects on the surface that should be deep and deep objects you think would be shallow.Frost has s major influence on soil......as moisture in soil freezes it expands and causes quite substantial movement.Biological processes also cause movement......worms,microbes,decay etc all contribute to the constant movement of soil.Wind erosion can also play a major part removing a lot of top soil if it becomes very dry and dusty.I have found Roman coins and artifacts superficially, when in fact they have been buried for 2000 years and should be very deep. Why happens? I don't know, but it happens.
And it might not be there and not found because?But it might be there and but not found because?