Find's Treasure Forums

Welcome to Find's Treasure Forums, Guests!

You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.

Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.

Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.

Click here to register!



Need Support Help?

Cannot log in?, click here to have new password emailed to you

Changed email? Forgot to update your account with new email address? Need assistance with something else?, click here to go to Find's Support Form and fill out the form.

My AT Pro review... Honesty is the best policy...

fir469

New member
Here's my go at a review of the Garrett AT Pro so far. I currently have about 30 hours logged on the AT Pro and will update as I log more hours... I'll try and break this down into specific categories and uses of the detector. I have used it so far to coinshoot, relic hunt, and water hunt fresh water, so no salt water review yet. When I purchased the AT Pro about a week ago I couldn't find too many in depth reviews so that's why I'm putting this together. This is my full honest opinion of the detector no embelishment, I currently own a Minelab Sovereign Elite, Minelab Musketeer Advantage, Garrett ACE 250, Tesoro Silver Sabre Plus, Nautilus DMC 2b, JW Fishers Pulse 8, and have owned a White's DFX300, Fisher CZ6, Garrett GTA350, White's BHID, Tesoro Sandshark.

Assembly and Construction: The Garrett AT Pro for me was very easy to assemble, taking only about 15 minutes. The headphone and coil jacks use specially designed pinned adapters and will require careful attention of alignment in order to not bend the pins inside the adapters. Take your time and it's a breeze. The fully assembled detector is very similar in construction to the ACE series and is a fairly solid build. I'd give overall construction an 8 of 10. The pro's are solid materials, comfortable hand grip, fairly lightweight, easy to use buttons, and comfortable arm cuff design. The con's are slight shaft wobble due to no cam locks (not horrible), arm cuff is too close to handle loading most of the detectors weight on your wrist and middle of the forearm, bad positioning of headphone adapter (Should be facing toward arm cuff).

Controls: The controls on the AT Pro are very similar to the ACE series with the addition of a few new features such as ground balancing (both auto and manual), iron audio and iron disc, and 6 modes as opposed to the ACE's 4. I feel the controls are all easy to operate and not confusing in the least. A very user friendly design perfectly adapted to both novice and pros.

In the field: I have taken the AT to numerous sites I have previously detected as well as 2 new locations in order to better learn the capabilities of this detector.

Ground Balancing: My soil here in New Jersey has very low mineralization and ground balances in the 85-90 range with very few sites entering into the 70's. Ground balancing is a nice feature of this detector and very simple to utilize. Auto ground balance requires just a few pumps up and down of the coil while depressing the GB button and you will hear the detector become quieter and more stable as it tunes itself to the ground minerals, it will also display a numerical readout that shows the mineralization of the ground, 80-90 indicates low mineralization and as the number decreases the mineralization present is higher. Manual ground balancing allows the user to fine tune your balance and allows more advanced users to run a positive or negative ground balance allowing for slight changes in sensitivity based on the type of detecting you will be doing.

Iron Disc and Iron Audio: I currently run my AT Pro in Pro mode, full sensitivity (if able), iron disc set to 35, iron audio ON. I feel the iron disc feature as well as the iron audio feature allow the user to quickly locate iron clusters while relic and old coin hunting to better zone in on where the more productive spots are. With iron audio on and your iron disc set higher then zero all iron that has been disc'd will come through with a low grunting machine gun type tone and all other targets above the iron disc will sound off with a midrange tone or high tone. With iron audio off, the iron disc'd targets will not sound at all and all targets will sound off with a midrange or high tone. Some targets such as crown style bottlecaps and square nails have the tendency to break through as high tones on most detectors and the AT Pro is no different, however, with iron audio ON those items will now sound off with both the "false" high tone as well as show their true nature with iron tones breaking through allowing the user to better discern if the target is in fact a "false" good signal. I have found these 2 features to be extremely valuable in heavy iron laden sites. The AT Pro has incredible target separation and in most cases will allow the good nonferrous targets to break through the iron and still sound off even in heavily iron infested and trashy sites.

Depth: IMO contrary to popular belief and reviews, the AT Pro is not the depth monster many claim it to be... Running this machine side by side with my Sovereign equipped with a 10x12 SEF coil the AT just could not attain the same depth the Sovereign and my Nautilus provide. The AT Pro during testing IN GROUND (not air tests) was able to pick up coin sized targets with reliable target ID to about 6" - 7". It was able to pick up coin sized targets to approx. 10" - 11" with degraded audio and target ID, and was unable in any setting to pick up a coin sized object beyond 11". I was able to locate buckshot sized targets to approx. 4".

Target ID: The VDI numerical readout of the AT is a nice addition to Garretts lineup and is a HUGE help to those that coinshoot. For me the VDI seems to be a bit shaky and not very accurate on targets beyond 6". The target ID was very accurate on shallow targets with most coin shaped targets not moving more then a number or two during location (I.e. 80-81).

My field report: I personally think this is an incredible detector for anyone looking to add a versatile detector to their arsenal. It isn't the deepest I've used, but definitely the most versatile. My only real complaint is that the unit LOVES hot rocks which is a downside to almost all single frequency machines, they ID around 37-45. I will be using the AT for scouting sites, in water detecting, and iron infested sites. Here's my breakdown of features...

Assembly (ease): 9/10
Construction: 8/10
Depth: 7/10
Target ID: 6/10
Weight and Balance: 7/10
Recovery Speed: 8/10
Target Separation: 9/10
Versatility: 9/10
Features (Bells and Whistles): 7/10 (Iron audio/disc is amazing)
Tones: 7/10
Headphones: 5/10
Coinshooting: 7/10
Relic/Old Coin Hunting: 6/10 (Needs more depth and loves hot rocks)
Freshwater Hunting: 7/10 (Somewhat chattery in our iron mineralized creeks and lakes)
Price: 9/10 (great price for all you get)
Overall: 8/10

Target ID: 7/10
 
Great review thanks for taking the time to write it up. Joe
 
I agree with everything you reported. I would like to add one important thing about the target ID. Like all detectors with displays the deeper your target the more inaccurate the ID. The tone should always take precedence on deep targets. If you get a repeatable deep tone dig it. The tone of the AT Pro will sound even if there is no information displayed. A sure sign of a deep target.
 
Excellent, honest review! Thanks for posting! You have a lot of good detail in there which should help a lot of folks decide if the AT Pro is for them. I've had mine for about two weeks but don't have much to compare it to. I've been using the same settings as you. I must admit though, I'm still a bit confused about the difference between using Iron Disc with Iron Audio .. and just using zero Iron Disc. It seems like they do pretty much the same thing... both allow you to hear the iron. :confused: I know that using Iron Disc with Iron Audio changes the breakpoint between low grunt and mid tone (so the threshold is at the Iron Disc setting), but if you set Iron Disc to 35 that tone threshold is only moved by a few points. Am I missing something else there?
 
for the money it is a good detector , good reveiw mon
 
exellent fir469 an un biased opinion is exactly what is called for at this point in time where the ATpro is concerned. :thumbup: Have to admit I love mine and wouldn't trade it for the world.
 
Kayaker said:
Excellent, honest review! Thanks for posting! You have a lot of good detail in there which should help a lot of folks decide if the AT Pro is for them. I've had mine for about two weeks but don't have much to compare it to. I've been using the same settings as you. I must admit though, I'm still a bit confused about the difference between using Iron Disc with Iron Audio .. and just using zero Iron Disc. It seems like they do pretty much the same thing... both allow you to hear the iron. :confused: I know that using Iron Disc with Iron Audio changes the breakpoint between low grunt and mid tone (so the threshold is at the Iron Disc setting), but if you set Iron Disc to 35 that tone threshold is only change is only moved by a few points. Am I missing something else there?

You are entirely correct on that. It is basically moving the break point which is incredibly helpful as a relic hunter which I primarily am. A lot of pewter items and very small brass just like small gold sometimes registers in the iron zone on a lot of detectors... for White's it's in the -15 to +5 range, on the AT it's Iron Disc 30 into the positives. Being able to adjust the iron disc and breakpoint also helps in deciding what iron you want to dig, the iron disc is based primarily on the size of the iron.

Goodmore, you are correct sir. I nailed a few targets today well beyond the target ID capabilties and I got a tone but no ID at all... almost all detectors are the same in that manner. What I meant mostly was that the target ID accuracy drops off on this machine a little sooner then others, The DFX was good on ID to almost 9", the Etrac's seem to be good almost to 10", My sovereign when using a meter is good to 8". This is all before ID degradation.

This is a fantastic machine for sure, not great in any one specific use but really good in all of them. That was the complaint I had about the DFX, especially being almost $700 more then the AT and why it was a complaint. But to have a unit as versatile as the DFX, $700 cheaper, AND Waterproof.... truly a winner in my book. It def won't replace my Sovereign on the beach, or my Nautilus in the depth department, but def has it for short on time hunts, iron infested sites, and in the water.
 
So your saying most everyone is not truthful in the depth of the machine? Your review takes precedence over the others? Just curious as I will cancel my order or return to sender if thats what you are stating. You are confident enough to say the AT pro reviews others are doing are inaccurate?
 
Stix said:
So your saying most everyone is not truthful in the depth of the machine? Your review takes precedence over the others? Just curious as I will cancel my order or return to sender if thats what you are stating. You are confident enough to say the AT pro reviews others are doing are inaccurate?

Whoa whoa Stix, like I said this is my honest opinion of the detector. I've used many before and still use many different detectors. I'm stating what I see in the field IN MY SOIL for the types of hunting I do. I do believe some of the statements floating around in regards to the depth achieved by some may be a bit of an exaggeration but I might be wrong. I couldn't pick up a dime any further then 10" in the soil and a quarter at 11", both with degraded audio. I did dig a 1825 Half Cent today at a measured 7" with a stable ID and tone, but most of my coin recoveries beyond 6" haven't been as solid. If you are looking for a machine that hits coins at 12"+ I'd say save for a more expensive detector... but for $500-$600 hitting 9-10" on coins with all the added abilities and features this detector has it's a great buy! It's not going to be as deep as an Explorer, Etrac, V3, Sovereign, F75, T2.... but for a midrange/cost detector, did you expect it to be?? I surely didn't... If you don't expect a BMW for the price of a Honda then you won't be dissappointed. If you do expect that then you may be selling your AT Pro quickly and I might be there to scoop it up...
 
Then it will be going back I wont even open it as I hate to try and send back a used detector. I can do that depth with an ace 250 and bigger coil or a tesoro. So yes I did expect more. Thanks for a honest review of the machine.
 
You did give a good honest appraisal. Thanks for the extensive report. I just wanted to make a comment about the detector comparison using the Sovereign side by side with the AT Pro. You were using an after market coil for the Sovereign, the "10x12" SEF" coil against the AT Pro's "8.5" x 11" with the 8.5" x 11" PROformance submersible coil. There is a considerable difference in coil size between the two, about 15% which could give the larger coil a possible depth adventage of about 1.5" - 2". Should a larger coil become available for the AT Pro, I think that the numbers would change.I know from looking at all the comparisons I have seen so far from various users posting their results, the AT Pro meets and beats a lot of other metal detectors costing a lot more. But, depth should not be the prime reason for purchasing a metal detector. There are many other variables involved when metal detecting, which can render a machine very meek when challenged with certain environmental situations. Because this is a Garrett Forum, I won't comment on the other detectors you use.

Your appraisal is appreciated by many, and I hope you have an excellent year metal detecting. :)
 
Definitely true John... The larger coil will offer more depth, however, The Sov with the standard 8" BBS coil it came with will do the same depth as the AT with the larger coil it has. In addition, the SEF coil's detection pattern utilizes the center blade of the DD which is only 10", overall size is 10" wide by 12" long at the tips of the butterfly pattern. So basically the 11" blunt nose DD the AT uses has a 1" larger blade of detection. The Sov new is $1,000, so I'd expect the deeper detection for almost twice the cost. For the price, the AT is the best all around contender on the market today....
 
The AT Pro does go deeper then the ACE 250. That's a fact! The ACE is turn on and go metal detector, a very good one at that too. However, the AT Pro can be tuned to operate in normal soil, to some of the highest mineralized soils including salt water. It has the same operating frequency as the Garrett Gold Scorpion, which is a killer on gold. The Pro mode on the AT Pro is much deeper then the ACE detector, coil size with coil size. The AT Pro was designed to excell with relics, find gold and has the standard mode to just simply turn it on and hunt for targets. It's also waterproof, which opens up new environments to the user not previously available with most land metal detectors. The ACE series and the AT Pro are very different, and also priced accordingly, yet affordable to nearly all users.

The AT Pro is simply one of the best metal detectors available at this time, even with costs set aside.......:thumbup:
 
Assembly (ease): 9/10
Construction: 8/10
Depth: 7/10
Target ID: 6/10
Weight and Balance.......................weight: HEAVY............BALANCE: AWFUL TO WORST
Recovery Speed: 8/10
Target Separation: 9/10
Versatility: 9/10
Features (Bells and Whistles): 7/10 (Iron audio/disc is amazing)
Tones: 7/10............................................5/9
Headphones: 5/10...................................USLESS
Coinshooting: 7/10
Relic/Old Coin Hunting: 6/10 (Needs more depth and loves hot rocks)..........for me it does pretty good in the dirt
Freshwater Hunting: 7/10 (Somewhat chattery in our iron mineralized creeks and lakes)
Price: 9/10 (great price for all you get)

OVERALL HONEST OPINION...........It is no Minelab..........i think i will be a great detector for fresh drops and with the higer freq..........it may help in small gold and chain recovery for the 2011 season.
just my opinion..........based on 95% for water hunting..............

several of us have been working with garrett to make the DD coil with longer cable an opition so some can chest mount and belt mount............SO FAR............NO COMMENT...........this would make it lighter and much more user friendly..............are u out there garrett ??
 
This just gets worse and worse. Fresh drops is what its good for..... ugh. Tones terrible, heavy and unbalanced. :stretcher:
 
Quote: "it will also display a numerical readout that shows the mineralization of the ground, 80-90 indicates low mineralization and as the number decreases the mineralization present is higher"..This is not right is it? I thought the higher the number the more mineralization-the lower the number the less mineralization..I'm confused..:shrug:..It seems to me that this detector balances between 80-90 just about everywhere unless you are at the beach..I don't really trust my auto ground balance number..
 
fir469,

Thanks for the great review.
Only wish you had posted it three days earlier.
Not your fault, I just may have pulled the trigger to soon.

Just got mine this morning..

Your statement," arm cuff is too close to handle loading most of the detectors weight on your wrist and middle of the forearm" is spot on.
My problem is I have a arthritic right wrist and a left wrist with a metal plate and screws in it.

Opened the box, easy assembly except for seating the cable pins into the control box.
Air tested fine, just short of my XT-705 stock coil.

Then I went out to the backyard and started swinging.
Noticed it felt a little bottom heavy.

Played with it on and off all day.
I noticed in the afternoon some shooting pain in my right wrist, switched to my left and felt discomfort after about 15 minutes.
Have not had these experiences swinging before.

The main reason I bought the AT-Pro was to use it in the water at a freshwater beach.
Maybe the water will ease the pain.

Took the screw out on the arm cuff and it does not want to move.
Also according to the instructions on page 9 if it does move it's down not up.

Any ideas, anyone?

The Target ID drops out pretty quick.
On the bright side it did pick up my 0.4 test gold nugget at a solid 4 1/2 inches!
I like that!

Good Hunting!

Denny
 
spiral said:
Quote: "it will also display a numerical readout that shows the mineralization of the ground, 80-90 indicates low mineralization and as the number decreases the mineralization present is higher"..This is not right is it? I thought the higher the number the more mineralization-the lower the number the less mineralization..I'm confused..:shrug:..It seems to me that this detector balances between 80-90 just about everywhere unless you are at the beach..I don't really trust my auto ground balance number..

Actually after reading the manual again, you are correct higher the number the worse it is... I too now doubt the validity of the auto GB numbers... based on other detectors I've used our soil is very low mineralized. Most sites around here balance around 86. Odd... I've never had any issues with falsing from mineralization on NON GB machines. We do have a lot of hot rocks though, the burned coal type.
 
Top