Buried Crap NJ
New member
Thanks i'll give it a trypspr said:I think if you lower the volume gain even further you will get the lower volume on deeper targets. You might try it next time you come across a target that is deep.
You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.
Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.
Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.
Thanks i'll give it a trypspr said:I think if you lower the volume gain even further you will get the lower volume on deeper targets. You might try it next time you come across a target that is deep.
earthmansurfer said:Screen Quality - For a color screen it is subpar in my opinion. Had I not had a V3i I might not say that. (The V3i is how many years old now and the CTX's color screen, though it clearly has more pixels, is just kind of blah.) Sort of sad considering the cost of the machine. (Now, if the sun is just coming up or about down it looks pretty good). If they could add some contrast and more vibrant colors I will change my opinion. But the colors and contrast is sort of flat - Just look at most of my videos. I mean, there IS NOT a contrast adjustment - that is weird. It's a bit hard to see where your disc pattern is at times as it is sooo faint. (Depends on outdoor conditions though.) I switch between patterns fairly often and sometimes am in the wrong one as one is minimal and the other open (when sun or the like is out it is easy to do). The VID numbers mostly cover the clock and if you run hot (like I do), the clock is almost always covered - hope they allow us to move something in an update.
Earthmansurfer, Have you tried different backlight settings, for "contrast" adjustment? I have finally set mine 7 for an average setting. At the very first, I didn't even have the backilight on, until I got in the shade and could barely read the screen. In the sunlight it seemed fine to me. So now, I set the backlight to an acceptable setting for shaded areas, in order to be able to read the screen in low light conditions.
I hold low on the handle, so the pinpoint button seems high to me as well. I guess I should try holding high on the handle and see how that woks. I would guess a persons hand size and grip location on the handle, may dictate weather the button seems to high or not. Next time out, I guess I'll try a high hold on the handle. By hold, I mean a very light grip, basically with two fingers actually doing the "holding", the others just keeping the machine stable. I found if I grip too tightly, my hand and arm get tired much quicker.......
earthmansurfer said:C&R Hunter - Thanks for the ideas. I played with the backlight setting when I first got the CTX and found 10 to be best. But, to be honest, I haven't touched it again but promise to do so now, in light of your comments.
I carry the machine mostly using just a few fingers and it is mostly effortless in the hands (agreed, you don't want to grip it hard). I generally have no problem with the button, only if my "grip" ends up being a bit low on the handle - as you said. What I found early on, if you have a problem getting the pinpoint button in, is just to use your thumb on the lower left corner of a faceplate as a lever of sort. Works fine but not I don't find it necessary.
Albert
wildherre said:The not so good
CTX lacks fully assignable tones . Why would you go half way on such an awesome feature?
The Xchange 2 software works but is not very intuitive and Im guessing a large number of users will never take the time to learn how to use it beyond doing the updates
Your personal assessment of the CTX is appreciated...Can you elaborate more on what you mean on the two quotes above from your assessment? ...I like the ability to change tones for the different bins provided in the Tone ID Profile. I personally would like to have a couple of more bins in the CO range, but that might be a programmers nightmare. I don't know, since I'm not a programmer.
I thought the XC2 application was very good, with the ability to create/modify programs etc., view Finds/GeoHunts on google map etc. Also the ability to save to the computer for safety, or put in a Collection for easy access in the XC2 app. Those are just my personal likes.....Everybody has different views/likes, and that is understandable..........HH
ramer said:What's a person to believe anymore? Previous to the 3030, the etracs, explorers, etc, were said to be the best. After purchasing the 3030, owners of the etracs and explorers are complaining that they were too heavy, were arm busters, too awkward, too slow.. They missed targets at 3 or 4 inches that the 3030 easily found. Previously hunted out areas by the etracs suddently came back to life using the 3030.
So apparently the etracs/explorers were not that great after all (missing all those targets at 3 inches). I wonder how many people purchased those detectors based on the poster's claims?
Myself, I don't get wraped up in all the hype, especially coming from brand loyalists. If this post upsets some people, well, that's what I think.
I definitely agree. There is a lot of experienced Trac'rs now that sure have been finding some really great finds with the Ctx. Just like the Trac did (and still does) when it first came out. Hype I don't think so. What it is, is another great machine by a company that has again stepped up and smacked another home run...ronfin said:ramer said:What's a person to believe anymore? Previous to the 3030, the etracs, explorers, etc, were said to be the best. After purchasing the 3030, owners of the etracs and explorers are complaining that they were too heavy, were arm busters, too awkward, too slow.. They missed targets at 3 or 4 inches that the 3030 easily found. Previously hunted out areas by the etracs suddently came back to life using the 3030.
So apparently the etracs/explorers were not that great after all (missing all those targets at 3 inches). I wonder how many people purchased those detectors based on the poster's claims?
Myself, I don't get wraped up in all the hype, especially coming from brand loyalists. If this post upsets some people, well, that's what I think.
3 inches? Try 10". I'm finding dimes at 9-10" in a trashy area where I never heard them with the ETRAC. It's not hype, but reality. I loved the ETRAC, but the CTX is a better machine.