Find's Treasure Forums

Welcome to Find's Treasure Forums, Guests!

You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.

Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.

Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.

Click here to register!



Need Support Help?

Cannot log in?, click here to have new password emailed to you

Changed email? Forgot to update your account with new email address? Need assistance with something else?, click here to go to Find's Support Form and fill out the form.

interesting news story,not personal,but i thought some might find it of interest

I don't think it is right for anyone to have a lock on our history for profit. I would feel proud to find a spot like that and see it protected. Now I would not want an archie filling his private collection but I doubt that many do that.
 
The Area's Largest Circulated Newspaper

ADVERTISERS
Nags Head, NC
Weather Magnet

NEWS SECTIONS
Front Page
RSS Top Stories
RSS Politics
RSS Business
RSS Letters/Editorials
RSS Sports
RSS Obituaries
RSS Features
RSS Entertainment
What's RSS ?
Calendar
National/World News
Financial News
Health News
Archives
EN ESPANOL

CLASSIFIEDS
Employment
Real Estate
All Categories
Place an Ad

SERVICES
Subscribe Online
Letter to the Editor
Locate Us
Guestbook

ONLINE FORMS
Anniversary Form
Engagement Form
Marriage Form

SPECIAL SECTIONS
Sentinel Scenes
Business Directory
Links
Entertainment Section
Area Info
Our Newspaper


advanced search
Google


*



Top Stories
Ft. Raleigh? New find on Roanoke Island creates stir
BY SANDY SEMANS | SENTINEL STAFF


Scott Dawson squats down in the area where trenches and embankments indicate an earthern structure.
Scott Dawson, a native of Hatteras Island and now a resident of Colington, has shared the location of a discovery he made on National Park Service property with that agency, which has now secured the area and posted surveillance to insure that intruders don't disturb the site.

Doug Stover, park historian of the Park Service, said that park officials think that the site may be the remains of Fort Blanchard, a Civil War fort.

But if proven correct in his beliefs, Dawson will be the envy of many archaeologists who have spent their careers in the search of the long-lost Ft. Raleigh, Ralph Lane's 1585 fort on Roanoke Island.

Dawson located the site on Feb. 6 and shared his findings with the Sentinel on the following day. To ensure the preservation of the site, it was agreed at that time to alert the National Park Service, and that the Outer Banks Sentinel would delay writing about it until officials had time to examine and secure the site.

A call was placed to Stover by this reporter to make arrangements for Dawson to take officials to the area. Since then, the site which includes earthworks, trenches and embankments, has been visited by several interested parties, including NPS officials, head of the Lost Colony Center for Science and Research, Fred Willard and Dawson. During one of those visits, Dawson, under a permit issued by the NPS, used a metal detector and, he said, there were numerous "hits," most of which indicated silver down under the layers of dirt.

"You wouldn't find this much silver at a Civil War site," said Dawson who is a Civil War historian. "What was interesting about using the metal detector is that it never registered lead or zinc, the two most common hits one gets when combing over a Civil War site, due to the bullets being made of lead or occasionally zinc."

Dawson agreed that there is probably a Civil War encampment on the top of the site, but said that he believes the encampment is on top of the 1585 Ft. Raleigh.

"Through careful analysis of the primary sources of the 16th century voyages," said Dawson, "I found two sentences from two separate first-hand accounts that gave me minor clues as to the location of the fort.

"Later, I found vague references to the fort's location in regimental histories from various Civil War first-hand accounts. They gave me enough confidence that I narrowed the location down to one of two places.

"Both places contained fresh water according to detailed maps from the 1700's. I decided to find where the fresh water sources used to be and then walk in a spiral pattern from them until I was at a radius of 100 meters. It didn't take that long. On Feb. 6, on my way to one of locations I had narrowed it down to, I found deep earthworks. I took some pictures and continued to search the area. Then I found more trenches cutting 90 degree angles at times and forming a large enclosure.

"I also found large square holes as well as smaller ones that formed patterns."

Dawson's primary sources for locating the site were documents written almost three centuries apart.

According to Dawson, during the Civil War, the Union Army's 27th Massachusetts camped out on top of Ft. Raleigh. He obtained that information, in part, from a letter written by William Derby, a soldier in the 27th. Derby also wrote that guards were posted to keep vandals out of the area which they were told was the original Ft. Raleigh.

"This is all over their [written] regimental history," said Dawson. "However, no one knew where they camped. Colonel Green, a Confederate commander in charge of the 2nd North Carolina, landed at Wiers Point at the end of the battle on Feb. 8, 1862. He arrived just in time to surrender because the fight was already over, but before he did, he had his men throw all their guns and equipment into a ravine -- most likely the one that is on Wiers Point since that is where he landed and surrendered.

"On the morning of February 9th, the 27th Massachusetts found these guns, and the record says they were in a ravine close by. So I went to that ravine and looked all over the place starting with a point of land that runs out into the marsh because, in John White's account, he says that in 1590 he went to a point of land opposite Dasamonquepue, which is an Indian town in Manns Harbor.

"So I went to the point of land next to the ravine south of Wiers Point. In John White's account, it never says why he went to that point of land. Only after he went there did he then round the northern tip to the settlement. Obviously, the settlement was not inside the fort or they would not have built a palisade around it.

"Also in 1587, when they are looking for Grenville's 15 men, they searched for a day and then took the boat to the fort the following day. He probably went to the settlement and after [finding] no sign of the men, then went to the fort where barracks or a few more houses were.

"There are lots of points of land on the Dasamonquepeu side of Roanoke, but the Civil War stuff narrowed that down for me. The presence of fresh water narrowed it down further."

Stover said that the next phase in the NPS investigation will be to scan the area after clearing away some of the brush. And in March, NPS archeologist Bennie Keel will visit the site to make his own preliminary assessment.

In the meantime, until further information is available, Ft. Raleigh remains a mystery. Although in the future the NPS may partner with private archaeologists on the project, currently it is a Park Service project
 
An archaeological dig would do more harm to that site than a detectorist or two would for a couple of hunts. Unless I was sure they were going to restore the area to it's original fort condition or declare it a national historic site, I'd be certain to give it a scan first. Chances are now that most of the artifacts there are forever lost.
 
i can't blame them,i don't know about private property laws in canada but archeologists are SOL if something is found on private property here,although i know they would like to change this.you would be betraying their trust if you reported it and didn't let them make that decision.

somebody posted a story of a university archeologist who was hunting artifacts on an indian reservation in florida,and he got caught,they searched his house and found some things.i believe the tribe dropped charges in a deal where he returned those things.this was a couple of years ago.

if a significant event in history happened and i found something to shed light on it i wouldn't mind turning it in,if it's just an old town site or something that everyone knew was around and the history about it was already recorded i wouldn't report it.i think the majority of what were taught about history from 500 hundred years or so ago is heavily embellished by someone,and i think archeologists exaggerate things too.
 
Top