Find's Treasure Forums

Welcome to Find's Treasure Forums, Guests!

You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.

Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.

Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.

Click here to register!



Need Support Help?

Cannot log in?, click here to have new password emailed to you

Changed email? Forgot to update your account with new email address? Need assistance with something else?, click here to go to Find's Support Form and fill out the form.

Identifying multiple targets simultaneously... Responses no longer allowed. If you have comments concerning multiple targets, please make a new post

Digger

Constitutional Patriot
Staff member
crtitterhunter said:
To avoid being redundant I'll just say refer to my prior posts in this thread for details...That what I've read about what a VLF detection field can tell you is very limited, and so it looks to be impossible to break apart two targets seen at the same time and ID them separately.

The CTX 3030 is an FBS2 detector, not VLF. FBS (Full Band Spectrum) detectors transmit a wave form (1.5kHz - 100 kHz) comprised of multi-period rectangular waves. FBS technology analyzes signals with reference to time, not frequency. By implementing signals using multiple frequencies in relation to time, FBS technology allows for improved discrimination by analyzing both ferrous and non-ferrous properties. For more details on FBS technology, read this article by MInelab's Bruce Candy, the man who invented it. Metal detector - Basics and Theory by Bruce Candy http://www.minelab.com/__files/f/11043/METAL%20DETECTOR%20BASICS%20AND%20THEORY.pdf

critterhunter said:
I've read several people make reference to the fact that these FBS2 coils are special in that they have electronics in them to see and track two separate targets at once under the coil. I've searched for this information but can't seem to find anything in relation to that. From what I can find thus far in the technical material I don't see any reference to this, but maybe I missed it?

critterhunter said:
I'm not even claiming that Minelab is indeed even saying it has that ability until I have more to read, so right now it's a mute point, but some people hinted that. Anxiously awaiting further technical data from Minelab on these aspects, so that's all I'll have to say until more is known. This is one of the key things I want clarified before I decide to buy one or not.


As published in the Minelab CTX 3030 brochure:
[attachment 232640 brochuremultipletargetstatement-Copy.jpg]


As published in the Minelab CTX 3030 brochure:
[attachment 232641 brochuremultipletargettestimonia.png]


As published in the Minelab CTX 3030 brochure:
[attachment 232642 brochuretargettrace.jpg]


As published in the Minelab CTX 3030 brochure:
[attachment 232643 brochuretargettraceexamples.jpg]
 
Randy,

Thank you for all of your unselfish giving to the entire Minelab community... When I first got my XT-70... You helped me learn and helped me recover some amazing goodies... You continue to be a great ambassador for all of the detecting community...

Thank you for all of your help here in the CTX-3030 forum...

Respectfully,
Paul Flickner
CTDirtFisher
 
Randy

Very well explained.

BCOOP
 
Randy thanks for your time and efforts on the CTX 3030. You have used the machine and are limited as to what information can be released and hopefully the non-believers will soon find out what Minelabs R&D have been working on the last couple of years. HH :minelab:
 
So, what determines where the bulls eye lands as shown in the photos above and what does the trace refer to? Is it just showing a record of the responses received by the coil during a swing or is it actually giving a visual representation as to what and where multiple objects lies beneath the coil as it hovers over it, if that's the case its amazing.... If only we had one video of this detector actually moving over multiple targets it would end a lot of questions...
Thanks
 
I hope the field testers are ready to release all sorts of videos upon it's release? Do you field testers???????
 
and you sweep the coil over some junk next to a coin. The target trace is going to be shown from iron to the coin and the bulls eye will lock on to the coin because it will be in the open search pattern of the coin mode and will not lock on to the iron trace that has been discriminated against.

Randy will clarify that.

BCOOP
 
The "bullseye" represents the target you isolated under the coil. If you worked the coil properly, it is probably directly under the center at this point in time. The TID number appearing at the top of the smartscreen represents the ferrous and conductive values of that "bullseye" target. The object at the bottom of the Smartscreen represents another target you passed over, but not currently under the center of the coil. The "Target Trace" tells you that you've passed over one target while getting to the other one. If you want to know the TID number for the other target, move the coil to isolate it, and center the coil over it.

Think of the Smartscreen as a sheet of graph paper that has 35 horizontal columns and 50 vertical columns. The horizontal columns represent ferrous properties and the vertical columns represent conductive properties. The Ferrous columns are numbered 1 - 35, from top to bottom. And the conductive columns are numbered 1 -50, left to right. The grid lines on the screen are in increments of 10.

In the first picture, the isolated target with the bullseye has a TID of 10/36. The ferrous of 10 makes sense because it is right on the first line down from the top. The 36 conductive also makes sense because it is about halfway between the third and fourth vertical line. Since the coil is isolated on that target, it provides a TID of 10/36. The other target is not under the center of the coil, but you just passed it because it left a Target trail. And judging by the grid location, it has a ferrous value of 11 and a conductive value of 12. If you swept back to that target, the TID would change to represet the 11/12 when you centered over it. And you would now have a target trail left to represent the first target. In the second picture, the target directly under the "hot spot" of the coil is providing both a grid location and the TID number of 12/36. If you're in the US, it is likely a penny. The other target that you passed over is likely iron, as the grid location indicates a highly ferrous target. If you moved your coil to center on what appears to be iron, you should get a TID of approx 31/42. And the previous target would be represented by the trace left on the grid only because it is not the one you are centered over. HH Randy
 
Randy, Now I do have a better understanding of this great feature thanks to you! This just makes me even more happier that I will be getting the CTX 3030. I am thinking about getting the 17 inch coil but I was concerned that it would be seeing too many targets at one time. But now seeing what the Target Trace can do! I will be buying the 17 inch coil to! Since it is a whole new ball game!
 
TerryinHawaii said:
Randy, Now I do have a better understanding of this great feature thanks to you! This just makes me even more happier that I will be getting the CTX 3030. I am thinking about getting the 17 inch coil but I was concerned that it would be seeing too many targets at one time. But now seeing what the Target Trace can do! I will be buying the 17 inch coil to! Since it is a whole new ball game!

Aloha Terry.... I'll sure want to know what you think of the machine in our enviornment. Hope you still have my e-mail and phone #.... Will pm you it just in case yah don't.
 
Thank you Randy for explaining, but hear what you say is a bit confusing for me?

The CTX 3030 is an FBS2 detector, not VLF. FBS (Full Band Spectrum) detectors transmit a wave form (1.5kHz - 100 kHz) comprised of multi-period rectangular waves. FBS technology analyzes signals with reference to time, not frequency. By implementing signals using multiple frequencies in relation to time, FBS technology allows for improved discrimination by analyzing both ferrous and non-ferrous properties. For more details on FBS technology, read this article by MInelab's Bruce Candy, the man who invented it. Metal detector - Basics and Theory by Bruce Candy http://www.minelab.com/__files/f/11043/METAL%20DETECTOR%20BASICS%20AND%20THEORY.pdf

Its looks FBS and FBS 2 works on the same principal, but I can be wrong. Stasys
 
My purpose in posting the link was (for those with an interest) to read the differences between VLF and FBS.
FBS2 offers "enhancements" to FBS technology, many of which are listed in the brochure. As time goes on, hopefully I am at more liberty to discuss those specific enhancements. HH Randy
 
I think maybe you should post a sticky with a guide to the brochure. It seems many have not read it at all but just wait for more info.

There is lots and lots of info in the brochure but people dont take the time to read it. Maybe a good read there with guidance and screenshots like you did here will keep all from asking about whats missing of info.

Even that it is software upgradable over USB was missed by many.
 
The video I want to see is a in-the-field comparison of a E-Trac going over the same multiple targets that a CTX does, using its trace technology, and how the E-trac fares in its analysis of the multiple targets. And the audio response's should be recorded, along with the display screen data. This would show to what degree, in improvement, the trace function is providing.
Of course, the machines being set-up as similar as possible to each other.
 
I don't believe that the brochure reaches down to the level of detail that I and many others are looking for. Thank goodness for Digger graciously offering his understanding of what this machine does. If someone can look at the brochure and understand it enough to be sold, good for them.
 
Digger with the constant updating the screen are targets going to be like moving a mouse on the computer? Where you get a trail if you are moving slowly and it moves the target up or down the screen? That ML wiggle is going to get important. Is depth going to still play a role in what it ids these targets at? Because mineralization should still affect the Con/Ferr reading when averaged.

Dew
 
Digger, thanks for the info. Though after reading it I'm afraid I'm still not seeing any clear declaration about FBS2 abilities in terms of the original question in the other thread. Again, I'm not even saying that Minelab is making such a statement because what I've read has been rather vague and can mean several things depending on how you read it.

Does it see two targets under the detection field at once and can separate them, or is it simply recording the history of the prior target it saw and keeping that on the screen while displaying the next one in the field? VLF stands for Very Low Frequency. Despite the marvelous advances of BBS and FBS, and now FBS2, a magnetic field is still a magnetic field and can only tell you so much, so I'm awaiting some real gritty details and a clear statement from Minelab that FBS2 can indeed see and separate two targets at once on the screen that are both being washed in the magnetic field at the same time.

And if that is the case, both targets still have to be at the same depth and laying very close to the point that they'd probably be touching, as the magnetic field can not hit a shallower target and still yet reach deeper to see a second one. The field in effect warps around the first metal object it sees and can go no further, as the eddy currents are "drawn" to and interact with the shallowest metal object under the coil. Even something shallower than the coin but as small as a staple will stop the field from advancing any further. If I'm missing some key and very plain wording that clearly states the ability to see and separate two targets in the field at the same time then please highlight that for me so I can stand corrected.

I remember reading a armature's (who had a background in electronics but if memory serves his speciality WASN'T detector technology) technical blurb about how these fields are processed. The RX coil receives it's signal from the detection field as a serial signal and not a parallel one. In other words, there is a "start" and an "end" to the signal as it is received. Think of it as somebody typing Morse code across a telegraph wire. You can't jump ahead and only look at a different part of the message separately without first receiving the leading code. That's sort of a bad example, because once the entire message is received you can in fact look at different words within it.

The way I understand it (correct me if I'm wrong) from what I've read the detection signal represents an entire "word" as the message, which can't be broken into individual words...As the entire signal represents the sum of all that is being "said", and there is no way to pick out relevant data from just a part of it.

Or, a more simple way to say it is...If you have the number 35690 as your received message (the sum conductivity of the target(s)), there is no way to go back and see what the actual numbers were (the individual conductivity of separate targets under the coil at the same time) that added up to 35690, let alone even know that there were indeed two targets in the field at the same time that added up to that final conductivity #.

And to complicate it even more (sorry, I tend to do that), in reality the final # is based on an averaged number somewhere halfway between the conductivity of the two targets. Say, for instance, seeing a pull tab and a silver dime at the same time...The resulting sum of conductivity is somewhere in between.

Again, I'm surely in no way an expert and only have a limited background in electronics, so what I've read could in fact be wrong or even the very way I "understood" the material...So feel free to set me straight on this if I'm blatantly wrong in my understanding.

Killmerg said:
Is it just showing a record of the responses received by the coil during a swing or is it actually giving a visual representation as to what and where multiple objects lies beneath the coil as it hovers over it.Thanks

That, summed up nice and short, is the question I still have. It just took me several paragraphs to say what you so clearly asked in one sentence. I haven't learned the lesson that brevity is the essence of wit, so I apologize to everybody for a rather lengthy message as I'm prone to do that.

Digger said:
The object at the bottom of the Smartscreen represents another target you passed over, but not currently under the center of the coil. The "Target Trace" tells you that you've passed over one target while getting to the other one. If you want to know the TID number for the other target, move the coil to isolate it, and center the coil over it.

This still sounds to me like a one target at a time type of deal. I need a definite statement from Minelab that says otherwise as this is one of the key things I want clarified before deciding to make the purchase. Really what I look forward to are field tests of it to another Minelab using a sharp detection field such as the 12x10 on undug targets. That will really show me just what the contrast in abilities are.

Again, thanks for the effort to provide me and others with this information. I really do appreciate the responses.
 
Hi Randy ,

Since the matrix is 50 x 35, is it safe to assume that the VID chart will be the same as the E Trac's chart ? .......(You had mentioned the 12/36 number as probsbly being a Penny ) ...Thanks, Jim
 
Top