slingshot said:
I love my Tesoros. I would just LOVE one that incorporates all in one so I could just carry ONE on my bicycle or carry by my side.
I, too, enjoy my Tesoro's, but I have more than one because 'just one' do-it-all hasn't really been made. Oh there were some close models, and without the water-proofing the Pantera was my favorite with a Dual Tone audio and a variable "Tone Break" [size=small](the Notch Disc. control w/Notch selector to 'Off')[/size], sporting the ED-120 Disc. circuitry.
Not too bad a unit overall, but with my health problems, to include a bad back, neck, shoulder, elbow and more, I have to be weight and balance cautious, so,
for me, I made the decision to get by w/o the Tone ID of the Pantera and opt for a lighter-weight model, choosing the Bandido II and even lighter Bandido II µMAX and Silver Sabre µMAX, and all of them have the thin, 6" Concentric coils mounted .
slingshot said:
So a simple ED-120 with a tone splitter circuit ...
I enjoyed the two-tone Pantera much more than the more 'processed' Golden µMAX, and the [size=small]micro[/size]-MAX units I had all suffered problems, registering many of the US coins in lower tone frequencies in some moderate-to-challenging ground conditions. I would think it should be possible to use a similar design housing, maybe a [size=small]micro[/size]-MAX size, or the slightly larger Tejón housing [size=small](probably a better pick)[/size] in order to accommodate the extra adjustment knobs and added circuitry.
slingshot said:
... and submersible to15' feet called the AMPHIBIAN ...
First, I don't think they should use a model name already used by a competitive manufacturer, which they have already done in the past. They used 'Eldorado' and 'Conquistador', and Minelab is one brand that used the name 'Eldorado', and White's used 'Conquistador' for a model they made a good decade before Tesoro was even born. Amphibian, if I recall, is another model name once used by White's.
slingshot said:
... would storm the market-without hiring engineers and incorporating the technology already there.
But I seriously doubt that it would "storm the market" because there is a much smaller percentage of hobbyists who really want and need a waterproof detector, and control housing leakage [size=small](which Tesoro is well aware of)[/size] is an issue that every manufacturer faces when they try to enter that market.
Personally, I believe Tesoro has made/is making some very competitive models for the 'simple' and 'display-free' market niche, and might so well if they simply concentrated on a controlled number of models with a proven reputation for performance, changed some of the models names so they would be less confusing, and then consider a manufacturing route to produce those models at a more affordable price point. Today, and for quite a few years now, a lot of their MSRP market share has been absorbed with a wide-range of newer, more
"fashionable" models with visual Target ID, VDI numeric read-out, and audio Tone ID.
I do agree with you, however, that a practical working Tone ID concept should be considered.
Monte