You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.
Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.
Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.
Hombre said:I started out in 1995 with the then new White's XLT, it was a little complicated to figure out at first. I made my own custom program out of the "Coins&Jewelry" program with the Pre-amp gain goosed up a bit and VCO turned on in all-metal mode. It found me my deepest coin, an 1866 2
Been a long time and my remembember isn't as good as it once was, but Ithink maybe 4-5 inches on a dime. There were no pull tabs or can slaw but foil from cig packs, gum wrappers and bottle caps were a problem no disc then. I hunted mostly city parks and ghost towns in Colo.Tom_in_CA said:Hobo lobo said:Over 50 yrs ago, 1962, Detecron, 2nd was a Whites Gold Master,.
Hey hobo, how deep would that Detecron get a coin to ? Eg.: depth on a penny or dime ? And what type sites were you detecting in those days, and what was an average day's haul ?
Tom_in_CA said:prep-1957, Interesting that you would recall a lot of "large" silver with that. I'm assuming you mean quarters and halves, versus dimes, for example, right? So too is my recollection of my first machine: the White 66TR. I too seemed to find my share of silver washingtons then in the mid 1970s. And even though I'd wracked up perhaps a dozen silver washingtons, had YET to find a mercury dime (although I recall finding silver roosies and some wheaties). Now, looking back, I realize it's because:
Those old machines were handicapped on depth, of course. So for example, 4" on a dime was perhaps max. However, naturally, the quarters being bigger signals, you could add a few more inches to that. And since we weren't using headphones, and probably weren't super-carefully looking for whispers, then .... it just stands to reasons that the # of quarters would be commensurately out-of-synch-more, than with the # of smaller targets (dimes).
So on that old Heath-kit, do tell: What was the depth on a dime? A quarter? etc.. What type places were you hunting then, and what was an average day's count of silver back then ?
Elton said:Fisher 555D or something close to that.in numbers .. !! LOL
Next was a coinmaster ........