Menu
What's new
Find's Treasure Forums

Welcome to Find's Treasure Forums, Guests!

You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.

Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.

Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.

Click here to register!

Need Support Help?

Cannot log in?, click here to have new password emailed to you

Has anyone noticed a.......

A

Anonymous

Guest
direct relationship between the channel selected when using noise cancel and the maxium depth of detection with the Explorer?
I use the S model, and it seems to detect deeper when set on channel 5.
The tests were with known targets & depths. There appeared to be no noise regardless of the channel chosen. This test was run in the country, and there is a definite noise on some channels when checked in a city some 18 miles away.
Am I missing targets when I set the machine for minimum noise versus using a channel that gives me more depth?
Thanks for any help.
 
Hey Ty, I think channel 5 seems to get optimum depth also,, it is also the one it selects by itself most often when no other explorer nearby at least here... might be imagination, but I think so.. also when another explorer is set to channel 5 a noise cancel seems to land on 11 which seems 2nd best to me?
 
Jim,
Thanks for confirming what I was seeing. I can detect a deep target I have buried only when the detector is on Ch. 5. To heck with any noise, I'm staying tuned to 5 for the next good beep.
Ty
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top