Picketwire
Well-known member
Which ground balance method do you prefer, none, automatic, manual, or ground tracking? The reason why would be nice too.
You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.
Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.
Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.
I do the same thing(noise cancel) first but also always wonder if that is something which changes with each frequency and is the whole process necessary everytime a new frequency is selected. I don't change from M3 often but do on occasion. When I do check the GB manually , I find the reading at the onset provided by tracking to be very close to the manual number I eventually end up with so I have reasonably high confidence the GB is pretty close most of the time. Frankly , my detecting acumen is not sufficient enough to know if manually setting the GB positive or negative would be advised.Guess I am being mildly skeptical but I find auto channel first then manually do the GB. Tracking is on for the reasons stated above. 95% of the big area I currently hunt shows 22-25 on GB, and it seems one can do Auto but you think the same channel would be chosen but its a crap shoot, 1-13 and not seemingly repeatable constantly
Not a "good" signal but I have seen really scratchy signals that I would probably not dig but caught my attention disappear if I kept trying to make it into a digable oneHave you ever tracked out a target by continuing to swing back and forth over it? If so, how many swings did it take and what kind of target was it?