Larry, I challenge you to tell us forumites a single turfed park, in the entire USA, where it is "legal" to "dig". Of COURSE every park in the USA has verbage against "defacement" or "alterations" or "digging". You can't show me a park where it is legal. And even if you had some city personell to tell you "Ok, as long as you cover it back up with no trace", I can gaurantee you that this is simply some city personell who is allowing you to break the law. Because I gaurantee you, the verbage is there, somewhere, to prohibit vandalism and so forth.
But you should KNOW that ALL those types verbage inherently implies the end result. So that, technically, if you leave the area exactly as you found it, then presto, you have not "alter
ed" or "defac
ed" anything, now have you?? The problem, is the temporary interim evil process. And THAT'S where the cat & mouse game that critterhunter spoke of applies.
I know you think this is "sneaky" or "illegal", but we ALL (yes, you too!) practice it, to some degree. For example: If you show up at your favorite park to hunt one day, where you are convinced it's "legal". You show up, and see a banner hung between two trees that says "
Welcome to the Annual Convention of Purist Archies", and you can see that a park event is hosting an archie convention. You tell me: Is this a good time for you to go, or .......... should you be a little more frickin' discreet and go somewhere else for that day? Or let's take nose picking: It may be legal, but ....... don't you practice a little discretion and don't do it when busy-bodies are watching?
It's nothing but common sense. There probably is nothing *specific" in critter-hunters city saying "no metal detecting". He's only trying to keep people from morphing OTHER stuff to apply.
So it has little to do with "legal" or not, it's simple discretion to NOT KICK A HORNET'S NEST.
If those non-alteration/digging clauses really bother you that much, then perhaps you've picked the wrong hobby??