Find's Treasure Forums

Welcome to Find's Treasure Forums, Guests!

You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.

Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.

Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.

Click here to register!



Need Support Help?

Cannot log in?, click here to have new password emailed to you

Changed email? Forgot to update your account with new email address? Need assistance with something else?, click here to go to Find's Support Form and fill out the form.

E-Trac/Xterra Coin Depth Comparison?

another thing that convinced me was when I did some tests, granted they were air tests, but I laid out various objects such as nails, and coins. And ran the coil over them to gauge the response. You could put it is pattern one notching out iron, whip the coil quickly over the nail and coin touching fast enough and you do not hear that high tone and maybe nothing at. Now swing the coil slower and you pick the coin up no problem. I tried all kind of things such as placement of the nails, on top the coin, one nail on each side, nails in different angles etc........and it taught me to slow down! I hunt primarily old homes which ALL have nails everywhere it seems, so I work slowly to try and get as many coins as I can get.

Try it sometime what I did above, also listen to the tones and notice how the numbers can vary because of the nails. It is something to think about
 
OK more practice at home.
I have found a penny and a small gauge wire on top of it rang wierd about 2 inchs deep and had on odd TID. Thought I was going to get a nickle. Wire wasn't copper, was jacketed.
 
Etrac twice as deep as the Xterra-I needed a good laugh and got one.
 
Why is the Etrac good for trash?
Is it different from the Explorer? and how
Are both better than the Safari?

I know how htey fit into hte Minelab lineup, but how different are they? And are they better than the Sov's

I know that better is relative but still when you read into the other forums each one's owners claim theirs is the best.

Quick comparo please.
Jeff
 
The term BEST is relative in that opinions vary, depending on the success each person may have had with a specific detector. The reasons I like the Etrac better than the Explorer or the Sovereign are partly electronics and partly ergonomics. Electronics....... if we are talking about target separation and identification in those trashy areas, the Etrac and Explorer offer both Conductive and Ferrous information on the TID. The Safari offers conductive only. The Sovereign also offers a conductive reading, which can be provided on an accessory meter. The Safari offers conductive discrimination in a notch format. The Sovereign offers conductive discrimination in a variable format with notch segment capabilities and the Etrac offers conductive notch discrimination and ferrous notch discrimination. The response time (reset between targets) of the Etrac and Safari seem to be much quicker than the Explorer or the Sovereign. Coils are interchangeable between the Etrac, Explorer and Safari. The Sovereign uses different coils than the FBS units. The Etrac offers more audio choices (one tone, two tones, four tones or multiple tones), which can be set for either ferrous or conductive properties, for those of us who like to "hunt by ear". The Safari offers a conductive or ferrous audio response, the Explorer offers a constant or multiple freq response on either conductive or ferrous. And the Sovereign offers a tone that gets higher in pitch as the conductivity increases.

Ergonomics.........We know the design of the Sovereign housing is much different than the Explorer, Safari or Etrac. Minelab altered the Etrac ergonomics (compared to the Explorer) by changing the angle of the grip by 15 degrees. If you haven't tried one, you wouldn't believe how much difference that 15 degrees makes in an 8 hour hunt!

I think those who have tried the Etrac appreciate how it performs in trashy environments for all of the reasons listed above. The balance is easier to manage for long periods of time. And, the balance allows for more precision in those slow sweeps intended to separate targets. The Etrac provides a numeric representation of what most of us consider to be the ferrous properties and the conductive properties. The processor speed is much quicker than earlier models, allowing for faster reset between targets and a much more "forgiving" sweep speed than earlier Explorers, Sovereigns or the Quattro. And, the multiple tone options of the Etrac allow users to hear their target without having to "break their stride" unnecessarily. Those things, combined with the new coil designs that have been introduced since the Etrac made it's appearance, all contribute to why some think the Etrac is "best". Frankly, although I like the Etrac for what it is capable of doing in nasty trashy areas, I still like my X-Terra for wide open hunting where I need more speed and don't need the ferrous property information. If the targets are really few and far between, I'll even pull out my XLPro now and again! The tone response on it is like having coin radar! JMHO HH Randy
 
Thanks Randy

That helps at least some. I like my 705 and am sure I will hang on to it for awhile (had no intent of parting with it anyhow). A guy here offered a lightly used Explorer XS for 700$ and a local retailer has a Sov GT new for 600$. I think I will go with now coils for the 705 and see how I fare! Maybe a new Ace250 for the kid and dump the bounty hunter (?).

So Many Machines and So Little Money$$$
Jeff
 
Top