tater said:
Yes i did find this bent up buckle with a $212 detector. So im less of a person because i found it with this. If you would google what it is you would understand but i assume you didnt because of your rude comments. These buckles sell for $1000s of dollars. Are you this rude to all people or just me. What a jerk
Actually your choice of detector wasn't the issue. I'm sure
pristine buckles that haven't suffered years of exposure to fertilizers and the plow do sell for plenty of money. But that one isn't like that.
The point is that you have about $200 bucks in the deal, if you count the cost of the detector. You sold it for just over 175% of your total cost. That is a great profit in anybody's book. Note I said "sold it" - you put it up for fair and open auction with the understanding that you would take the winning bid when it sold. Research ahead of time, using examples in the
same condition as yours, might have shown that it would not bring more than it did.
Look at it this way: you nearly
doubled your money on that one item. Many people wear their arm out finding clad, and don't achieve those results.
You can't say you lost money, because you made a lot more than you had in it. The fact that it sold for less than you had imagined it would, well... the ending buyer paid what he or she thought it was worth. It is what it is