that is whether or not much of the intended detecting time was going to be spent detecting on wet sand, on a saltwater beach. My impression from the original post is that this may indeed be the case. So if an F2 & F4 were traded to replace an Explorer for saltwater use, then this was a terrible deal. Matter of fact it would not even be a deal, but downright dishonest to suggest that an F2 or F4 will cope with saltwater the way a multi-freq will.
And if indeed that's what transpired, and if you think there was a strong reaction here, then having the original thread posted over on the Beach & Water Forum would have led to a much stronger reaction by that crew, more likely a small riot!
Those of us that saltwater hunt run across people that are very confused from time to time. Do I try to sell or trade them detectors despite the fact that I own enough to open a detector store? Hail no! The honorable thing to do is to help them on the spot to make their trip to the beach more enjoyable, even going so far as to adjust their detector for them, and pointing out where they should be concentrating on based on their equipment. If they ask what they need, I usually qualify them, just as any good dealer would, and then make suggestions of what detectors they should consider.
If this deal had worked in the opposite direction, that is, going from a single freq to a multi; CZ or EXP
then it would have probably been viewed in a better light on the dealer's end. But no amount of "accessories" are going to cause an F2 or F4 to compete with a multi freq on a beach! Scoops don't turn F2's into Explorers!
HH
BarnacleBill