You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.
Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.
Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.
Is that you detecting with an old blue box, right in front?Hmmmm, sure beats my boom stick with a two pound magnet.
I never did any test like you have but minelabs will go deep. My Explorer 2 with a WOT coil was very heavy and deep on The beach.Dam thing wore me out.Here is a pic of a small men’s 14kt band in wet saltwater sand at one foot. I could detect it with all metal/pinpoint mode on my Excalibur 1000 (original Excal, not Excal II).
Can anyone beat this depth?
Thanks tvr. I have heard the Fisher Impulse is good. Thanks for the reply.There are "in the sand" test videos out there (but not on this forum) of the Fisher Impulse AQ LTD doing better than that. I can attest to it's depth at the salt water beach but have no pictures to show.
All I can say is Wow on the 30” depth!My Sovereign GT with the 13" ultimate coil and the Oll Explorer XS with the 15" WOT is Way deeper. I dug a silver plated bottle/can opener at roughly 30".
This is hilarious. It looks like a dredge site. I’ve seen this before, except without all the people (well, maybe a few).Hmmmm, sure beats my boom stick with a two pound magnet.
That is great depth on a small gold ring,the excal is still a force to be reckoned with.Here is a pic of a small men’s 14kt band in wet saltwater sand at one foot. I could detect it with all metal/pinpoint mode on my Excalibur 1000 (original Excal, not Excal II).
Can anyone beat this depth?
My only real complaint about the Impulse AQ LTD is that it is susceptible to EMI that the Excal is not bothered by. I take both the Impulse AQ and an Excal to the beach so that if I hit an area with a lot of EMI that is killing the AQ, I can go grab the Excal. I can say positively that I dig way more earring backs with the AQ than I do with the Excal and while most are stainless steel, some are gold. Then there was this hunt from last year where I suspect the Excal would have found everything I got with the AQ, but one just never knows for sure (10k large chain, three rings, one of them white gold and other assorted stuff all from one small cut in the water):Thanks tvr. I have heard the Fisher Impulse is good. Thanks for the reply.
Hmmmm, sure beats my boom stick with a two pound magnet.
Ok it caught my eye. That picture I believe is close to me. South HavenThanks tvr. I have heard the Fisher Impulse is good. Thanks for the reply.
Agree on the EMI and keep my excal in case it’s an issue. Nice haul shown also! Still no gold chains yet for me.My only real complaint about the Impulse AQ LTD is that it is susceptible to EMI that the Excal is not bothered by. I take both the Impulse AQ and an Excal to the beach so that if I hit an area with a lot of EMI that is killing the AQ, I can go grab the Excal. I can say positively that I dig way more earring backs with the AQ than I do with the Excal and while most are stainless steel, some are gold. Then there was this hunt from last year where I suspect the Excal would have found everything I got with the AQ, but one just never knows for sure (10k large chain, three rings, one of them white gold and other assorted stuff all from one small cut in the water):
View attachment 40395