James/Washington
Active member
Do not know how the reactivity is going to be and it is not updatable nor is it waterproof. I will sit this one out for a while. I will be watching.
You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.
Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.
Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.
Single, Selectable or Multi-frequency detectors don't have to be waterproof. True, a water hunter who wants to dunk their detector might like waterproof, but the vast majority of metal detecting hobbyists don't wade out into the water much, if they even water hunt at all. Most are land-based hobbyists, and even most Avid detectorists spend their time on land. There are plenty of waterproof detectors for avid waders and swimmers to pick from. The new APEX is a sensibly-priced model that is more of an up-scale entry-level competitor to appeal to the majority of the folks in this great sport.Why would you design a "simultaneous multi-frequency" machine and not make it waterproof? Big disappointment for water hunters.
I hunt a lot of very mineralized and challenging environments and have owned and used SMF detectors over the past 2½ decades. They work, sometimes, pretty well is some places ... but not everywhere or all-the-time. That's one of the reasons the bulk of my detector outfit operates on a single frequency, by deign or by my selection. I'm glad to see the concept Garrett took, but the big questions is how well the new APEX will work at each of those frequencies, and we don't know which frequencies are used in the 'Multi' operation or how well it will perform. I know I'm looking forward to getting one in my hands to see if it's a fit for me or not.Since I live in some of the worst red dirt on the planet and the Vanquish could not handle it, to have the individual frequencies when you need one is great.
I agree, it does 'look' interesting. The display is ample-size and VDI readout is improved. Enough frequency choices compared with some of the completion, and it is priced reasonably affordable and doesn't need to be 'dunk-proof', either. Looking ahead to checking one out. Nt sure it will provide the in-the-field performance I need, and will need some smaller-sizes coils to handle the nasty debris environments, but I'm always willing to give a new model with potential a good try. It is simply an improved or enhanced Ace series model from some of the audio I heard and aw in the video, but who knows? Maybe the made it a better all-purpose performer?I'm interested in seeing some videos of how it run's before i purchase one. I like what i see so far.
Look's extremely lite, The icons up top remind me of a whites machine.
Has one more frequency than the Equinox 600 to, not being waterproof doesn't really bother me.
I feel it is more intended to compete with the Minelab Vanquish, especially the 540 at about the same MSRP that comes with a 9X12 DD coils syandard.The apex is not intended to compete with either the ORX or Equinox. It's more intended to counter the Simplex and Vanquish.
Not completely true Monte. some of us enjoy doing many things. When I go to water areas (no longer dive) I use waders and go in up to chest level. most people who go to parks with lakes only wade, that's where jewelry is lost. I have the Nox 800, half the time I use the multi freq, the other half I only use a single freq, depending on how much trash is there. Lakes and desert prospecting I use the ORX, the ORX with the water kit ,is a killer, in the desert it handles this Arizona hot mineralized dirt better than any detector (other than pulse) that I have tried. and I've used the GMT (and 24k) fisher GB, it handles much better than the Nox. I've hunted all over AZ, as you move farther north to Mohave count,, or Prescott area the ground is not nearly as hot as it is here close to the boarder.I doubt if the Apex can handle the ground down here. as far as 20khz for prospecting, just my opinion but you might just as well use dowsing rods, your chances of finding small gold is slim. I had a Noka fors for gold 20khz, it was worthless. Step up the freq to 40 khz and you will find small gold, 70 khz and you will spend all day picking out stuff you need a loop to find.Single, Selectable or Multi-frequency detectors don't have to be waterproof. True, a water hunter who wants to dunk their detector might like waterproof, but the vast majority of metal detecting hobbyists don't wade out into the water much, if they even water hunt at all. Most are land-based hobbyists, and even most Avid detectorists spend their time on land. There are plenty of waterproof detectors for avid waders and swimmers to pick from. The new APEX is a sensibly-priced model that is more of an up-scale entry-level competitor to appeal to the majority of the folks in this great sport.
I'm sure Garrett will come to the rescue of those who want frequency choices in a waterproof model when they upgrade their AT series.
Monte
Maybe a dive housing could be made for it out of an otterbox. Or the Deus/style underwater kit.Man, just how much would it have taken to water proof that little screen? Good for shallow water detecting. The Ace 250 can do that. So it proberily it can out do the Pro series, but only to the waters edge. I just don"t get it, couple O rings a gasket. Good for ten feet. Well there go"s the wading gang.
I guess I'll qualify my statement , which was: "... the vast majority of metal detecting hobbyists don't wade out into the water much, if they even water hunt at all. Most are land-based hobbyists, and even most Avid detectorists spend their time on land."Not completely true Monte. some of us enjoy doing many things. When I go to water areas (no longer dive) I use waders and go in up to chest level. most people who go to parks with lakes only wade, that's where jewelry is lost.