steve herschbach
New member
Hi vlad,
You say in the ground performance is the standard to go by.
Are you talking about depth? Target separation? Accuracy of discrimination? No doubt a combination of these and more.
How about the look and feel of the machine? I will admit there are some machines I will not use because they look like Buck Rogers toys, and they may very well work just fine.
How about feature sets. I really do use notch discrimination for what I do. Some swear they will never use it. So as you have seen a lack of notching is something I report unfavorably, but you may not care at all about it.
What about the fact that ground varies so much, and interfence and other factors, that what "performs" well for me may not perform so well for you? I do this in-depth performance test of two units, and declare one the winner. You do the same, and get the opposite results because your conditions vary.
Is one of us a liar? People (not you) are quick to make those kinds of accusations when results do not match. But the fact is more likely differenent machines do better in different locations on different targets. We are both reporting the results in our own areas and the results vary. That is why we see regional favorites develop in detectors.
And we all have our own little personal differences. Maybe I swing my coil fast, you swing yours slow. So just on that basis alone one machine works better for you than I.
Nothing, but absolutely nothing, beats going out and using machines yourself under your own conditions. Which is what I do. But my results cannot substitute for a person doing their own testing.
Steve Herschbach
You say in the ground performance is the standard to go by.
Are you talking about depth? Target separation? Accuracy of discrimination? No doubt a combination of these and more.
How about the look and feel of the machine? I will admit there are some machines I will not use because they look like Buck Rogers toys, and they may very well work just fine.
How about feature sets. I really do use notch discrimination for what I do. Some swear they will never use it. So as you have seen a lack of notching is something I report unfavorably, but you may not care at all about it.
What about the fact that ground varies so much, and interfence and other factors, that what "performs" well for me may not perform so well for you? I do this in-depth performance test of two units, and declare one the winner. You do the same, and get the opposite results because your conditions vary.
Is one of us a liar? People (not you) are quick to make those kinds of accusations when results do not match. But the fact is more likely differenent machines do better in different locations on different targets. We are both reporting the results in our own areas and the results vary. That is why we see regional favorites develop in detectors.
And we all have our own little personal differences. Maybe I swing my coil fast, you swing yours slow. So just on that basis alone one machine works better for you than I.
Nothing, but absolutely nothing, beats going out and using machines yourself under your own conditions. Which is what I do. But my results cannot substitute for a person doing their own testing.
Steve Herschbach