is a believer in reality, simplicity, and has an open view and knowledge of the metal detector industry and what some detector makers can, and can not, do for a broad consumer base. For a third-of-a-century I have owned and used, promoted and sold, Tesoro products. I still have a few of my all-time favorite Tesoro models on-hand and I put them to use.
You had a few good questions but they have been misdirected as we have all seen.
MI-AuAg said:
First of all, I must say, I am not a Tesoro owner.
Sorry to hear that because I know there must have been at least one good, functional Tesoro model that would/could appeal to you. It does depend, however, on the type of hunting you do and the sites you work, trash you deal with, and your patience level. By the way, what kind of detecting Do you do? Why haven't you owned a Tesoro model?
MI-AuAg said:
I could have been, had the "Cazador" come to fruition.
The so-called Cazador was a mistake from the start. They asked for suggestions for a name, then announced the chosen name way too often on this and other Forums, all the while not having anything even close to researched and developed product. Very sad because it got s ,lot of folks talking about a detector model 'concept' that wasn't really developed. It was more of a hint of a model idea that was never to be due to the loss of people behind any design.
Besides, since it was never really a product nor did it have any real described features and capabilities, how can you say you would have owned a Tesoro if that dream would have been offered, not knowing what it might have been or how it might have, or not have, performed?
MI-AuAg said:
I have an interest in all brands and models of detectors.
Good, and so do I. I am curious as to what makes and models you currently own, what search coils do you use, and what types of hunting do you like to engage in and the type of locations and conditions?
MI-AuAg said:
It bothers me to see a venerable company like Tesoro languishing in stagnation with suggestions of it's impending demise!
Hey, I even commented on the sad affair of Vince making the decision to hook up with the big discounting Kellyco as a Dealer since that was always a no-no consideration of Jack Gifford, Vince's and James' Dad. It was also a move that alienated many long-time Tesoro Dealers and even some Tesoro loyalists .
With the loss of dealers, especially 'local' dealers who used to stock and promote Tesoro products, that didn't help Tesoro's business in the USA. It was bad enough that they had gone/have gone so long without producing a more up-to-date product offering to be competitive, then to make that decision, to me, spelled a loss for Tesoro and put them on a slide to their eventual demise. Are they there now? Maybe not considering the foreign market that still enjoys what Tesoro offers and it fits well with many detectors they have been and are using, especially in trashier locations.
Personally, I do hope they can manage to stay afloat and produce some new and creative products, but we are seeing quite a change in the direction many of their competitors have been working to market their products and produce well-features yet competitive detector models. It's both a combination of desired features with some reduced MSRP's that makes it so competitive and difficult for Tesoro production to keep up with what they currently have, as well as with what the Tesoro engineering folks are capable of producing.
Let me add a dollar sign to this as well, because it takes ample dollars to pay for the design and development, for the materials, and for the marketing to compete ... and do so to be able to produce a more featured product at a lower price in today's challenging market.
MI-AuAg said:
It seems to me, rather than changing the color of control boxes on existing models, why not make a few MEANINGFUL modifications to a few popular models?
I agree that it wasn't really a major move to switch the colors of the control housings and rods to black, especially since most of the manufacturers made such a switch from '82 to '88 while Tesoro stayed with the brown and gold or grayish colors schemes. They did make an Outlaw that, by Vince's comments, was basically based on the Bandido II [size=small]micro[/size]MAX, and I don't think the changes were a good move with regard to the mode-change function and two-position button.
MI-AuAg said:
Over the years, I have read how the Tesoro faithful have expressed desires of things like multi tone ID, better/different ground balance, etc., on a variety of models.
The Tesoro faithful I know and have hunted with for a long time have wished they just reintroduced some of the older proven models, especially the Bandido II [size=small]micro[/size]MAX and Silver Sabre [size=small]micro[/size]MAX.
Many I know,
and I, would like to have had a 10-Turn manual GB rather than 3¾-Turn on the [size=small]micro[/size]-sized housing models. I know I would also have preferred some manual GB function with the Cortés in the Discriminate mode, or have the Discriminate mode either manual GB or tied in with the automated GB in th4e Lobo SuperTRAQ. Those things could have been easily done,
and should have been, with the original design of the product and not left as a factory preset GB for Discrimination.
And a number of "multi-tone" attempts were made that resulted in failure. The old Royal Sabre
[size=small](made from 4/'86 to 9/'89)[/size], and later the Golden Sabre Plus [size=small]
(3/'89 to 2/'92)[/size], did have a 2-Tone Audio ID that was controllable with the variable Notch Disc. control that worked rather well. And the improved Pantera [size=small]
(7/'90 to 2/'92)[/size] had the ED-120 Discrimination circuitry, and again the variable 2-Tone Audio ID. but that was a rather short-lived production. It was kind of 'replaced' with the Golden Sabre II [size=small](7/'92 to 5/'99)[/size] that was essentially the same detector as it used the Pantera circuit board. The only difference was the Golden Sabre II lacked the 10-Turn manual GB control and was factory preset.
The more modern 'multi-tone' efforts included the Euro Sabre, [size=small]
(introduced in 5/'01[/size]) that tried to give us some adjustment to audibly classify Iron based targets, and the Golden [size=small]micro[/size]MAX that took two attempts to get the circuitry right to allow some 4-Tone ID adjustment but kind of flunked out. The better 'multi-tone' detectors in the industry have been and are those that use much more modern digitally-based circuitry and not the older-style analog design.
MI-AuAg said:
Why not pick a couple popular models and make those meaningful/useful uprades?
Again, like the Outlaw attempt, what we have seen hasn't been a tremendous success. It would be better to just make the better models all over again. Change the name to eliminate confusion, but let it be known that a new model is an improved re-entry of an older model. Like change to the newer pushbutton on a Silver Sabre [size=small]micro[/size]MAX, but give it a new name, and for heavens sake, dump the
'µ' symbol in the
'micro' MAX name.so folks don't keep calling it a 'u' or 'You' MAX.
Offer them with the lighter-weight, thin-profile 6" Concentric coil
[size=small](they call it a 5.75)[/size] and reduce the weight of the current coil offerings. Also don't try and fool people with some magic abilities of an 8X11 Double-D search coil and think that's going to improve the field performance of their detectors. It won't, in most cases, and the Discrimination isn't as clean as a Concentric [size=small]
(especially with ferrous-based targets)[/size], nor are they as easy to pinpoint with. Besides, I have used several different Tesoro models in evaluating all of their standard Vs accessory search coils for hunting in a very iron nail infested site, and all of their DD coils have terrible performance compared with the 6", 7", 8" or 8X9 Concentric search coils.
MI-AuAg said:
A Tejon "II", or Lobo ST "Plus", or whatever.
Both of those models already have spme design changes they could use to improve them other than adding a II or Plus to their name.
MI-AuAg said:
It could add renewed interest, and additional cash flow, both, important to the continued viability of ANY company! IT WOULD SHOW THAT TESORO IS STILL IN THE GAME.
Tesoro is still "in-the-game" in some markets, especially overseas where many avid detectorists still don't use a Target ID models because many of those have been based on the original designs that simply showed references to USA coinage. Many countries have coins made out of nickel, steel, or other mixtures where these magnetic metals really mess up both audio and visual ID performance, plus their size, thickness and conductivity are not even close with the references most US coinage displays show.
Tesoro needs to get new engineering coupled with ample cash flow to design and develop and then market a competitive Target ID and Tone ID model, but do it in a way to compete with what is out there right now, and that isn't going to be easy. Other manufacturers have also been struggling in this current market as well. Teknetics Omega 8000 at $599 was a very serious contender that was priced $300 lower than White's MXT Pro and offered more functions and display info, but they dropped it and replaced it with the Omega 8500 that was a flop.
However they did reintroduce the very versatile and multi-featured T2 'Classic' at $499 which is $26 less than the Vaquero and $100 less than the suggested list of the DeLeén, and neither of those Tesoro's come close to the features and performance of the T2 'Classic.'
White's models, generally, are overpriced for the current market, but their MX5 at $599 is still a tough one for any Tesoro to try and compete with and match the features. Their newest low-cost entry models are both low on the list of being very impressive so struggling White's has some catching up to do.
Tesoro's last real attempt to corner a dedicated market, the Relic Hunting crowd, was the Tejón and it has a retail list of $699. There they are met with the challenge in the dollar category with the Garrett AT Pro at $699.[size=small]95[/size], and even tougher challenges from the more featured Makro Racer at $499 and Racer 2 at $749, or the Nokta FORS CoRe at $699 and FORS Relic at $749 ... and the latter comes with two search coils at that price, too!
MI-AuAg said:
The upgrades would not require any difficult, or expensive engineering. Just upgrades to proven, existing models. (some people are making these upgrades/mods on their workbench)
On-the-bench some people are adding manual GB to preset units, but that cancels any warranty and in many cases results in some degrading of performance. No, for Tesoro to do any really serious 'upgrades' they would not come out ahead. They have tried that.
They should, in my opinion, just look at what they currently offer, also look at some models that were/are popular that were discontinued and consider a remake of them, and at the same time try to compete with modern engineering with digitally-based models that offer more features, better performance, and at a lower and more competitive MSRP. That isn't going to be easy in this current era when the metal detecting hobby, as a whole, is slowly losing ground and isn't anywhere close to what it was when Jack Gifford started Tesoro in the hey-day of the hobby.
MI-AuAg said:
Moving forward with a few upgrades could eventually pave the way to a Cazador type machine in the future, by showing that Tesoro is moving in a forward direction.
JUST A THOUGHT.
Forget the 'Cazador,' and I don't think trying to 'upgrade' current model offerings is the way to go, either. Instead, we either have to accept the fact that a Tesoro is what it is or once was, appreciate what they can do, and keep the better offering at work doing what they do pretty darn well. And while using what works, and supporting Tesoro in their efforts to stay afloat in this changing industry, hope that some magic will happen and they can somehow develop a new and competitively priced model with features folks demand, or that they will be bought out by someone who will do just that.
Just my opinions as I see them.
Oh, back to my starting comment:
"You had a few good questions but they have been misdirected as we have all seen." They have been misdirected because you and many Former Tesoro Forum posters, and those contributing today, have been asking question on the Forum directed directly to Tesoro ... but Tesoro hasn't been and isn't responding to any Forum post. Questions need to be e-mails directly to Tesoro or they need to have phone calls made directly to them in order for them to wake-up and realize they have a good consumer base of loyal fans out here who want and need some action on their part.
Perhaps the best and most factory/consumer relationship example s what we have been witnessing on the Nokta and Makro Forums, both here and other places, where Dilek reads and monitors, and contributes answers to their Forum-based questions and comments. No other manufacturer participates like they do, and that would be wonderful to see from Tesoro.
Monte
[size=small]
PS: It is really good to be able to share our honest and open opinions on the "Beep & Dig Detecting Forum" compared to a Tesoro hosted site where a moderator could get on our case for saying anything negative.[/size]