Find's Treasure Forums

Welcome to Find's Treasure Forums, Guests!

You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.

Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.

Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.

Click here to register!



Need Support Help?

Cannot log in?, click here to have new password emailed to you

Changed email? Forgot to update your account with new email address? Need assistance with something else?, click here to go to Find's Support Form and fill out the form.

Xterra Depth vs. Tesoro

Prospector

New member
I have an X-terra 30 that gets above average depth for me. I know this is a Minelab forum, and I am not trying to start anything, but wanted to know how the Xterras compare in depth to the U-max model Tesoros, as well as the "Hot machines" Cibola, Vaquero. Thanks!
 
I don't know about the depth compared to X-Terras but the Tesoros always impressed me with their sensitivity. They're always super sensitive to small objects. There's an impression by some people that the Tesoro Silver might be as sensitive as the 6" HF DD coil for the X-Terras.
 
I've owned all three X-Terras and had both the regular tone and the high tone Vaquero and Cibola. Personally, I liked the high tone version better. Although the Cibola seemed to perform well in my moderately mineralized soil, I have to admit I liked the capability of having a manual GB on the Vaquero. When you "super tune" them, they do have remarkable depth. I could hit a nickel with that small 5" HOT coil at "airtests" of over a foot. However, I found actually field hunting with them fully "super-tuned" was less than "air-test depth", and quite noisy. Especially when I bumped against a weed, a clod or even wet grass. Another point I didn't like about "super-tuning" them was that, if you forgot to set the gain or threshold down when you went to pinpoint, it would blow your ears off! Without "super-tuning" them, they didn't impress me for depth. Not enough, at least, to replace several other detectors I have. The U-Max series has been around for a long time and has proven itself to be a good detector in iron. Not nearly the depth of the V, C or X-Terras. And compared to the X-Terras, none of these you mentioned have anywhere near the functionality. (notches, TID, tracking, Auto GB, NC, etc.) That is just my opinion. Others may vary. HH Randy
 
Top