X-5 vs CTX 06

[IDXMonster]

Much to some people's disappointment I'm sure, the video is a bust. First of all, I couldn't find but 2 High conductors, and they were obvious. I was finding 5 targets with the CTX, flagging them and checking with EX2. Then the other way round for the next 5 targets. Never found the 3rd high conductor,so I went for medium to low conductors. Both machines found everything the other found without hesitation. Audio was and is better on the EX2. Just more descriptive. Ferrous Coin is a VERY optimistic separation option...it makes EVERYTHING a coin! Maybe that's why people have such great success with it,never mind the bushel of garbage that comes along with it. They both did great though, I couldn't say one was better than the other. I DO find more with the CTX,comparatively...so WHY that is,I can't say right now. Maybe I'll say later....
Sorry fellas and gals....until I have the proper site to test with, it's just not happening. The site is THAT devoid of high conductors,or even nickel type signals!

 

[sprchng]

I've run both a lot , sorry etrac , not a match for the CTX in combined with the 6",,,,not to mention the presence of the target trace.
Not a knock on the etrac , which I love , just a fact about features and their effect on finds.

 

[IDXMonster]

-- moved topic --

 

[cz70pro]

Glad you tried it. It was an interesting comparison to try.