IDXMonster
Well-known member
Wouldn’t that just be the cats pajamas! Are these new Multi-IQ coils using chips? What’s that connector look like,anyone got a pic?
You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.
Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.
Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.
dewcon4414 said:GREAT invention. But Ralph stopped making them for ML explorers because ML made it to costly. I hadnt heard that he wasnt making ANY inline probes thou any more? Now thats real disappointing. The ability to tell what you were digging over just knowing where the target was saved more digging and did less damage. Not to mention i hate having to lay my detector 3' away from me when checking the hole. 4" on a target...... and getting a digital read out reduced time especially of near surface targets. That ment no digging, popping out the target cleanly, and more of course less time could put more in your pouch at the end of the day for those with limited time out there.
Dew
Tom_in_CA said:Yes, the lack of Sunray probe is what caused legions of explorer faithfuls to NOT "update" to the CTX. And it will be the same exact reason why I would not switch to this new Ox. I will fool around with it for other reasons to experiment with new tech . But .... will be in tears that it can't have an in-line probe The loose probes (carot, etc... ) are nowhere near as fun and useful as the in-line probes.
Sunray probes: R.I.P.
Jason in Enid said:..... As great as they are, you should be adopting new tech