Would like an honest comparison between the F 75 and CZ3D

[jimmyk]

Hi:

I see some pretty remarkable posts concerning both these detectors and would like to know how they stack up to each other as far as depth, ease of operation and any other comparisons you might like to make.

Thanks in advance and keep on diggin'

jimmyk in Missouri

 

[Low-Boy/LCPM]

I have had the CZ3 but now have the F75 but my friend has the CZ3 and when he hunts with the small coil he can keep up with me but when it comes to relic hunting and iron he can't keep up with me at all. The F75 can see and unmask way more targets. That is the way it is in Calif..Also Nasa Tom says the F75 in four tone hunts just like the CZ3 it helps those old coins hit at the fourth tone and the 3rd tone. But the F75 has a lot more to it as far as programing and it seems Nasa Tom now uses the F75.

 

[jim tn]

I had them both and finally just sold the cz3d. I simply was no longer using it. On trashy sites, where I mainly hunt, the F 75 flat out excelled over the 3d. The F 75 was much more comportable to swing for long periods and at the very least, the 75 was equal to the 3d in depth and perhaps even, goes deeper. I've had cz's since well back into the 90's, but the F 75 today is finding many more good targets for me then was the cz3d. HH jim tn

 

[jimmyk]

Thanks for the replys. I appreciate your input.

jimmyk in Missouri