Shoot me a PM with a link to that thread, because I want to set that guy straight.
He's feeding people some very bad info. Needless cost using just about the most expensive brand names of chargers and lipos, but more importantly risky extra 4th cell higher voltage way beyond reason that might blow things up.
I don't see him wiring that battery up internaly to bypass the voltage regulator on the Excal or anything, so he's not going to get a dime's worth more preformace feeding it 4 cell voltage over the 12.6V of a 3 cell. The regulator will only take in say 10 to perhaps 14V or so, but regardless of the input voltage the output remains a static set voltage to stabilize the circuit board for steady operation, otherwise a detector would constantly be drifting out of tune as the battery drained. Regardless of whether the input voltage is say 10 volts, 12, or 14, the output stays fixed to the electronics at say 9V or whatever the Sov/Excal circuit board is using.
All he's doing is risking frying his voltage regulator. Don't know what the high end input voltage of the Sov/Excal window of input specs is, but I would think over 14V is redlining it as the regulator is designed for a roughly 12V 8AA series pack. If he's claiming better performance and that's not just his imagination then he probably was using borderline rechargeables before where the cells were weak and sagging the voltage in and out of LVC under load, causing instability issues. I've seen the same claims made on other detectors but the regulator makes it more of a "perception" thing IMO, unless it's the weak battery issue that was causing issues before.
Besides, those Thunderpowers and that Triton charger are premium bucks. Far many other less expensive lipos and chargers that do just as good and even better. My $20 computerized Accucel 6 charger does more than the Triton will from memory on various types of cell chemistries, etc. Last time I checked a comparible charger was around $100 on up. Trust me on that. The RC community researched the charger I'm using extensively and it's the hottest item among the more "price conscience" of the RC crowd. But it, like the Triton, is not a good choice for a novice at batteries. Not hard to set them up, but requires a bit of reading on the net to know what you are doing with various battery types. If you decide on the Accucel, there is a huge thread out there on the web talking about proper settings, or I posted a thread I made in the battery sticky where I walk you right through how I set it up for nimhs, nicads, and lipos. You'll know you found the right thread if you see me listing the settings on it's menu in direct order and then explaing how to set them. Kered picked two of them up he likes that charger so much.
Far better though to buy a simple plug-n-charge lipo charger if you don't want to read up on charging technology and proper settings for various cell types, only wanting a charger to do lipos and not one to do other battery types too. Just make sure to get a charger that isn't putting out more than the charge rate ability of the lipo or it could be big problems. Most lipos will at least handle a 1C charge rate. A 1 hour charge time, or equal in amp rate to the capacity of the pack. For example...my 750ma Rhino packs I charge at .750 amps. That's the nice thing about a computerized charger, because I can set the amp rate specifically without having to drop it to say a static setting of like 500ma which would take longer to charge. Lipos can charge at 1C with no worries of stressing the pack. Some lipos now even will allow higher charge rates, but I always stick with 1C because it's easy to do the math and also added insurance I'm not stressing the pack's life.
Oh yea, here's my response to you on the 4 cell thing and a few other issues with doing a lipo conversion...
http://www.findmall.com/read.php?21,1787241