Hi,
After I wrote this report up I thought a bit about the M6 and how it fits in with the White's lineup. I think White's missed a bet by not shifting the M6 just a hair off-frequency from the MXT so as to keep the two units from cross-talking. I suspect lots of MXT owners might like the M6 as a second unit, and so that would have been a nice touch.
In Alaska we get lots of questions about nugget detecting. Here is what I posted on the Alaska Gold Forum regarding the M6:
"A question many Alaskans will ask is "how will the M6 do on gold nuggets"? This is a reasonable question since the M6 is based on the White's MXT, which has found many pounds of gold in Alaska. Just as the MXT is based on White's premier nugget detector, the GMT.
Here is a rough guide (my opinions only) on how to look at the White's selection as relating to nugget detecting -
1. White's GMT - 100% nugget detector, with only the rarest of applications for other types of detecting. For someone that wants to use the detector for nothing more than prospecting. Best sensitivity to small gold nuggets.
2. White's MXT - 60% coin, relic, and jewelry detector and 40% nugget detector. For the person who will mostly be looking for coins, relics, jewelry, etc. but who also will spend quite a bit of time using the detector to look for gold nuggets. Sacrifices some small gold sensitivity compared to the GMT in order to be a better all-around unit. That said, some people in Alaska are using the MXT solely for prospecting. ut it is not as sensitive to small gold as the GMT and so the GMT is a better choice for creeks south of Anchorage.
3. White's Matrix M6 - 90% coin and jewelry detector, 10% nugget detector. For a person who wants a simple to operate yet powerful machine for in-town detecting yet who might venture out every once in awhile to look for gold nuggets. Sacrifices threshold based all-metal modes in favor of quieter operation and so loses a small edge compared to the MXT for nugget detecting. But still a better nugget detector than the vast majority of the general purpose detectors on the market."
I might add to this by noting the DFX as being 98% general purpose and 2% nugget machine. It has the capability in theory, but is too cryptic in operation for most to access what nugget hunting potential is has. But I'm sure a nugget or two has been found with the DFX somewhere.
Steve Herschbach
Steve's Mining Journal