Find's Treasure Forums
Welcome to Find's Treasure Forums, Guests!
You are viewing this forums as a guest which limits you to read only status.
Only registered members may post stories, questions, classifieds, reply to other posts, contact other members using built in messaging and use many other features found on these forums.
Why not register and join us today? It's free! (We don't share your email addresses with anyone.) We keep email addresses of our users to protect them and others from bad people posting things they shouldn't.
Click here to register!
Need Support Help?
Cannot log in?, click here to have new password emailed to you
Changed email? Forgot to update your account with new email address? Need assistance with something else?, click here to go to Find's Support Form and fill out the form.
Whites 6000 di pro sl
- Thread starter pescadore
- Start date
The 6000DiPro has a larger housing and weighs about a pound more than the XLPro. The 6000Di uses 4 C cells. The XLPro uses 8 AA cells. Technically, there were some electronic changes made with the smaller boxed models. From a user's standpoint, I don't think you could tell the difference in anything but physical size and weight. HH Randy
Wayfarer
Member
[attachment 63379 DiProSLampXLPropic-small.JPG]
The electronic differences are that the XL Pro uses smaller surface mount electronics instead of the traditional style boards. Supposedly they "cleaned up" the circuitry with a few tweaks while they were at it. I own both, and prefer the XL Pro mostly because of the weight, but the XL Pro does seem to operate a little smoother. Maybe it's the placebo effect
. But the SL still is one good machine and almost identical in operation and performance.
The electronic differences are that the XL Pro uses smaller surface mount electronics instead of the traditional style boards. Supposedly they "cleaned up" the circuitry with a few tweaks while they were at it. I own both, and prefer the XL Pro mostly because of the weight, but the XL Pro does seem to operate a little smoother. Maybe it's the placebo effect
. But the SL still is one good machine and almost identical in operation and performance.Ringzapper
New member
I have heard these 2 detectors are the very best analogue meter detectors ever built.
after having used the 6000 in many of it's variations over 30 years of
hunting i would agree with that statement!..arguably,the xl-pro in particular is one of the best coin "sniffers",and that meter is incredibly accurate even on deep coins!..the combination of pro with the 5.3 concentric coil is unbeatable in the hands of an experienced user!
(h.h!)
j.t.
hunting i would agree with that statement!..arguably,the xl-pro in particular is one of the best coin "sniffers",and that meter is incredibly accurate even on deep coins!..the combination of pro with the 5.3 concentric coil is unbeatable in the hands of an experienced user!
(h.h!)
j.t.
i think you will find that the xl-pro IS better balanced with the 6" coil on board!..my "blackmax" is on all the time!..never take it off!
really makes the pro very pleasant to hunt with!..in my opinion,the sl is a heavier,not as well balanced detector..tendency to be box heavy!
(h.h!)
j.t.
really makes the pro very pleasant to hunt with!..in my opinion,the sl is a heavier,not as well balanced detector..tendency to be box heavy!
(h.h!)
j.t.