Hi Canewrap, first let me say that I have the 5" excelerator and it is a super coil in the trashiest areas. It is not as deep as the 9.5 coil and who would expect that from the the little hockey puck.
Here's what Jeff Foster said about the 9.5 coil.
"The 9.5 inch coil appears to outperform the 6x10DD in ferrous mineralization up to about a 4 to 3 MXT coin-inch mineralization strength. For stronger soil, the 6x10DD outperforms the 9.5 for coin-sized targets. (But, the 1400DD easily out does both in mineralization this bad, for coin-sized targets.)" Maybe one of the guys with the book would tell you how the 5.3 "was rated by Jefff or depth. The 9.5 pinpointes great for me in my soil and seems to be my deepest coil..
I don't have Jeff's book and so I can't run the test to tell how mineralized my ground is. According to Jeff and several other Guru's the GND numbers don't tell how mineralized your ground is. So your 57, 58 reading doesn't tell me how mineralized your soil is. I can't get Jeff's book right now, but I wish I knew when to switch between the concentric and DD.
We all have opinions on which coil is best, but they are opinions. Jeff seems to have run actual tests and I have only heard good things about the book.